Skip to main content

Efficient custom mapping from data model to ViewModel/Dto or vice versa with LINQ support

How many lines of codes we waste on mapping from one source to a destination like DataModel to ViewModel.  There are well-known Mappers available to do the same but nothing can come close in terms of performance by using manual mapping just that we need to write at too many places or takes a huge chunk of code lines in our main codes, may be under controllers, services or where ever you prefer projection in code.

The idea is to develop a proper way to deal with mappings. Some time back I had written code for manual mapping under LINQ queries. Manual model mapping - LINQ projection technique, this still works great. The idea is to create a cleaner solution as a whole new package for handling Mapping which can support general mappings between models and support of LINQ projection to select the limited number of rows as required.

Primary objectives of the implementation.
- A Data model to view model/DTO/or any other.
- view model/DTO/or any other to a data model.
- Support of LINQ projection without selecting all columns from a table.
- Support of IEnumerable.

The above items are compelling enough to create mapping structure with performance benefits.

Let's start with creations of interfaces to support One-way mapper, Two-way mapper, and support of LINQ queries in both case.

Basically, all we need is creation of interfaces and implementation of mapping classes based on models.

A simple IMapper implementation which simply converts from one model to other. It is simple enough not to have any kind of explanation.

 public interface IMapper<TSource, TResult>  
 {  
   /// <summary>  
   /// Maps the specified model.  
   /// </summary>  
   /// <param name="model">The model.</param>  
   /// <returns>Projection/Mapping from <paramref name="model"/> to a new type.</returns>  
   TResult Map(TSource model);  
 }  


IQueryMapper is for supporting LINQ projection, it is a kind of extension of above.

 public interface IQueryMapper<TSource, TResult>  
 {  
   /// <summary>  
   /// Gets the expression for projection/mapping.  
   /// </summary>  
   /// <value>  
   /// The expression for projection/mapping.  
   /// </value>  
   Expression<Func<TSource, TResult>> Expression { get; }  
 }  


ITwoWayMapper, It is opposite of  IMapper by inheriting the feature. Like if IMapper is for User to UserDto, this would allow having UserDto to User.

 /// <summary>  
 /// Two way mapping for models.  
 /// </summary>  
 /// <typeparam name="TFirst">The type of the first.</typeparam>  
 /// <typeparam name="TSecond">The type of the second.</typeparam>  
 /// <seealso cref="IMapper{TFirst, TSecond}" />  
 public interface ITwoWayMapper<TFirst, TSecond>  
     : IMapper<TFirst, TSecond>  
 {  
   /// <summary>  
   /// Maps the specified model.  
   /// </summary>  
   /// <param name="model">The model.</param>  
   /// <returns>Projection/Mapping from <paramref name="model"/> to a new type.</returns>  
   TFirst Map(TSecond model);  
 }  


IQueryTwoWayMapper, is similar to ITwoWayMapper but with LINQ support.

 public interface IQueryTwoWayMapper<TFirst, TSecond>  
   : IQueryMapper<TFirst, TSecond>  
 {  
   /// <summary>  
   /// Gets the reverse projection/mapping expression.  
   /// </summary>  
   /// <value>  
   /// The reverse projection/mapping expression.  
   /// </value>  
   Expression<Func<TSecond, TFirst>> ReverseExpression { get; }  
 }  


All these above implementations use Interface Segregation Principle principle, we would see advantages for them soon.

Based on above interfaces, we can create extension methods to map it to expressions or System.Func implementation based on need. I have not entirely tested extension methods based on above interfaces but it is really simple to extend based on a need to do something else. This is one of the major parts of Mapping Structure.

 /// <summary>  
 /// Extension methods for mapper  
 /// </summary>  
 public static class ExtensionMapper  
 {  
   /// <summary>  
   /// Maps the model from <typeparamref name="TSource"/> to <typeparamref name="TResult"/>.  
   /// </summary>  
   /// <typeparam name="TSource">The type of the source.</typeparam>  
   /// <typeparam name="TResult">The type of the result.</typeparam>  
   /// <param name="mapper">The mapper.</param>  
   /// <param name="source">The source.</param>  
   /// <returns>Projection from <typeparamref name="TSource"/> to <typeparamref name="TResult"/>.</returns>  
   public static IEnumerable<TResult> Map<TSource, TResult>(  
     this ITwoWayMapper<TSource, TResult> mapper,  
     IEnumerable<TSource> source)  
   {  
     return source.Select(val => mapper.Map(val));  
   }  
   /// <summary>  
   /// Maps the model from <typeparamref name="TSource"/> to <typeparamref name="TResult"/>.  
   /// </summary>  
   /// <typeparam name="TSource">The type of the source.</typeparam>  
   /// <typeparam name="TResult">The type of the result.</typeparam>  
   /// <param name="source">The source.</param>  
   /// <param name="mapper">The mapper.</param>  
   /// <returns>Projection from <typeparamref name="TSource"/> to <typeparamref name="TResult"/>.</returns>  
   public static IEnumerable<TResult> Map<TSource, TResult>(  
     this IQueryable<TSource> source,  
     IQueryTwoWayMapper<TSource, TResult> mapper)  
   {  
     return source.Select(mapper.Expression);  
   }  
   /// <summary>  
   /// Maps the model from <typeparamref name="TSource"/> to <typeparamref name="TResult"/>.  
   /// </summary>  
   /// <typeparam name="TSource">The type of the source.</typeparam>  
   /// <typeparam name="TResult">The type of the result.</typeparam>  
   /// <param name="mapper">The mapper.</param>  
   /// <param name="source">The source.</param>  
   /// <returns>Projection from <typeparamref name="TSource"/> to <typeparamref name="TResult"/>.</returns>  
   public static IEnumerable<TResult> Map<TSource, TResult>(  
     this ITwoWayMapper<TResult, TSource> mapper,  
     IEnumerable<TSource> source)  
   {  
     return source.Select(val => mapper.Map(val));  
   }  
   /// <summary>  
   /// Maps the model from <typeparamref name="TSource"/> to <typeparamref name="TResult"/>.  
   /// </summary>  
   /// <typeparam name="TSource">The type of the source.</typeparam>  
   /// <typeparam name="TResult">The type of the result.</typeparam>  
   /// <param name="source">The source.</param>  
   /// <param name="mapper">The mapper.</param>  
   /// <returns>Projection from <typeparamref name="TSource"/> to <typeparamref name="TResult"/>.</returns>  
   public static IEnumerable<TResult> Map<TSource, TResult>(  
     this IQueryable<TSource> source,  
     IQueryTwoWayMapper<TResult, TSource> mapper)  
   {  
     return source.Select(mapper.ReverseExpression);  
   }  
 }  


Implementation

Sample DTO

 public class Book  
 {  
   public string Name {get;set;}  
   public string Publisher {get;set;}  
 }  
 public class BookDto  
 {  
   public string BookName {get;set;}  
   public string BookPublisher {get;set;}  
 }  

A simple one-way mapper implementation of IMapper based on above models.

 public class BookMapper  
      : IMapper<BookDto, Book>  
 {  
      public Book Map(BookDto model)  
         => new Book  
         {  
           Name = model.BookName,  
           Publisher = model.BookPublisher  
         };  
 }  


Usage

 public ActionResult AddBook(BookDto model)  
 {  
      var bookMapper = new BookMapper();  
      var bookDataModel = bookMapper.Map(model);  
      // Code to insert book.  
 }  


Two-way with IQueryTwoWayMapper sample mapper implementation.

 public class BookMapper  
   : ITwoWayMapper<Book, BookDto>  
     , IQueryTwoWayMapper<Book, BookDto>  
 {  
   public Book Map(BookDto model)  
         => new Book  
         {  
           Name = model.BookName,  
           Publisher = model.BookPublisher  
         };  
   public BookDto Map(Book model)  
       => new BookDto  
       {  
         BookName = model.Name,  
         BookPublisher = model.Publisher  
       };  
   public Expression<Func<BookDto, Book>> ReverseExpression  
       => model  
       => new Book  
       {  
         Name = model.BookName,  
         Publisher = model.BookPublisher  
       };  
   public Expression<Func<Book, BookDto>> Expression  
       => model  
       => new BookDto  
       {  
         BookName = model.Name,  
         BookPublisher = model.Publisher  
       };  
 }  


With above codes, it is a bit confusing why similar type of codes are repeated for function and expression implementation. The thing is System.Func and general function cannot be truly converted to expression easily. If we directly try to pass Func than it would execute on CLR rather than SQL level which would result in the selection of all columns and then the projection. With Expressions, only required columns can be selected.

Also, Expression cannot be simply converted to Func since those can be really complex with multi-level of Expression Tree. If you still need a cleaner way and ready to compromise performance than this line can be used with expression compilation but I won't recommend going in that way.

 public BookDto Map(Book model) => Expression.Compile().Invoke(model);  


Implementation of above

The separation of interface allows us to use in any combination. Use, IMapper with IQueryMapper in a case of one-way mapping with LINQ queries. IMapper could be individually used like in the first example and in above we used all interface but just by inheriting two of them which depends upon their root inheritance.

 public ActionResult AddBook(BookDto model)  
 {  
      var bookMapper = new BookMapper();  
      var bookDataModel = bookMapper.Map(model);  
      // Projection from Context Book data to BookDto through Expression by using extension method.  
      var bookDtos = BookRepository.All().Select(bookMapper.Map());  
 }  


I have used the implementation as a concept but use as per your requirement, altering codes and further separation/removal of interface and extra implementation of Extension methods.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Elegantly dealing with TimeZones in MVC Core / WebApi

In any new application handling TimeZone/DateTime is mostly least priority and generally, if someone is concerned then it would be handled by using DateTime.UtcNow on codes while creating current dates and converting incoming Date to UTC to save on servers. Basically, the process is followed by saving DateTime to UTC format in a database and keep converting data to native format based on user region or single region in the application's presentation layer. The above is tedious work and have to be followed religiously. If any developer misses out the manual conversion, then that area of code/view would not work. With newer frameworks, there are flexible ways to deal/intercept incoming or outgoing calls to simplify conversion of TimeZones. These are steps/process to achieve it. 1. Central code for storing user's state about TimeZone. Also, central code for conversion logic based on TimeZones. 2. Dependency injection for the above class to ...

Trim text in MVC Core through Model Binder

Trimming text can be done on client side codes, but I believe it is most suitable on MVC Model Binder since it would be at one place on infrastructure level which would be free from any manual intervention of developer. This would allow every post request to be processed and converted to a trimmed string. Let us start by creating Model binder using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.ModelBinding; using System; using System.Threading.Tasks; public class TrimmingModelBinder : IModelBinder { private readonly IModelBinder FallbackBinder; public TrimmingModelBinder(IModelBinder fallbackBinder) { FallbackBinder = fallbackBinder ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(fallbackBinder)); } public Task BindModelAsync(ModelBindingContext bindingContext) { if (bindingContext == null) { throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(bindingContext)); } var valueProviderResult = bindingContext.ValueProvider.GetValue(bin...

Handling JSON DateTime format on Asp.Net Core

This is a very simple trick to handle JSON date format on AspNet Core by global settings. This can be applicable for the older version as well. In a newer version by default, .Net depends upon Newtonsoft to process any JSON data. Newtonsoft depends upon Newtonsoft.Json.Converters.IsoDateTimeConverter class for processing date which in turns adds timezone for JSON data format. There is a global setting available for same that can be adjusted according to requirement. So, for example, we want to set default formatting to US format, we just need this code. services.AddMvc() .AddJsonOptions(options => { options.SerializerSettings.DateTimeZoneHandling = "MM/dd/yyyy HH:mm:ss"; });

Centralized model validation both for MVC/WebApi and SPA client-side validation using FluentValidation

Validation is one of the crucial parts of any application. It has to validate on both client side and server side requests. What are target features or implementation from this article? Model validation for any given model. Centralized/One code for validation on both server-side and client-side. Automatic validation of model without writing any extra codes on/under actions for validation.  NO EXTRA/ANY codes on client-side to validate any form. Compatible with SPA. Can be compatible with any client-side validation framework/library. Like Angular Reactive form validation or any jquery validation libraries. Tools used in the implementation? FluentValidation : I feel DataAnnotation validation are excellent and simple to use, but in case of complex validation or writing any custom validations are always tricker and need to write a lot of codes to achieve whereas FluentValidations are simple even in case of complex validation. Generally, we need to validate inc...

Architecture solution composting Repository Pattern, Unit Of Work, Dependency Injection, Factory Pattern and others

Project architecture is like garden, we plant the things in certain order and eventually they grow in similar manner. If things are planted well then they will all look(work) great and easier to manage. If they grow as cumbersome it would difficult to maintain and with time more problems would be happening in maintenance. There is no any fixed or known approach to decide project architecture and specially with Agile Methodology. In Agile Methodology, we cannot predict how our end products will look like similarly we cannot say a certain architecture will fit well for entire development lifespan for project. So, the best thing is to modify the architecture as per our application growth. I understand that it sounds good but will be far more problematic with actual development. If it is left as it is then more problems will arise with time. Just think about moving plant vs a full grown tree. Coming to technical side, In this article, I will be explaining about the various techniques ...

Blazor 0.5.0 Interop JavaScript from C# and C# to JavaScript call

Blazor provides two-way communication from JS to C# and C# to JS which is called Interop. The version upgrade to Blazor 0.5.0 changed the approach in interactions between cshtml and JS files. The newer version simplifies JS calling by avoiding pre-registration of JS function. In this article, we would see how to call a JS method by passing multiple parameters from cshtml and parameterized call from JS to cshtml. The scenario that is used in this article has a Kendo AutoComplete to search book and populate information based on the selection. An example of a call to JS from cshtml await JSRuntime.Current.InvokeAsync<string>( "searchBook.Init", "#SearchTitle", new DotNetObjectRef(this)); Takeaways from the above example: - JSRuntime.Current give environment to execute out-process JS. - InvokeAsync is a function that would allow executing the JS function. - The searchBook.Init is a JS function call, we would see it in details in the second sec...

LDAP with ASP.Net Identity Core in MVC with project.json

Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP), the name itself explain it. An application protocol used over an IP network to access the distributed directory information service. The first and foremost thing is to add references for consuming LDAP. This has to be done by adding reference from Global Assembly Cache (GAC) into project.json "frameworks": { "net461": { "frameworkAssemblies": { "System.DirectoryServices": "4.0.0.0", "System.DirectoryServices.AccountManagement": "4.0.0.0" } } }, These  System.DirectoryServices  and  System.DirectoryServices.AccountManagement  references are used to consume LDAP functionality. It is always better to have an abstraction for irrelevant items in consuming part. For an example, the application does not need to know about PrincipalContext or any other dependent items from those two references to make it extensible. So, we can begin wi...

Channel, ChannelReader and ChannelWriter to manage data streams in multi-threading environment

I came across Channel class while working with SignalR which looks really interesting. By looking into NuGet packages ( https://www.nuget.org/packages/System.Threading.Channels ), it seems just 4 months old. The Channel class provides infrastructure to have multiple reads and write simuletensely through it's Reader and Writer properties. This is where it is handy in case of SignalR where data streaming needs to be done but is not just limited to that but wherever something needs to be read/write/combination of both in a multi-threading environment. In my case with SignalR, I had to stream stock data at a regular interval of time. public ChannelReader<StockData> StreamStock() { var channel = Channel.CreateUnbounded<StockData>(); _stockManager.OnStockData = stockData => { channel.Writer.TryWrite(stockData); }; return channel.Reader; } The SignalR keeps return type of ChannelReader<StockData> open so that whatev...

A wrapper implementation for Kendo Grid usage

A wrapper implementation for any heavily used item is always a good practice. Whatever is not written by us and used at a lot of places should be wrapped within specific functionality to keep it future proof and easily changeable. This also encourages DRY principle to keep our common setting at a central place. Kendo UI items are enormous in configuration, one of an issue I find people keep repeating codes for Kendo Grid configuration. They have built very flexible system to have any configuration, but in most of the cases, we do not need all of those complicated configuration. We would try to see a simpler configuration of same. The actual core implementation is bit complex, but we do not have to bother about it once done since the focus is just on usage only. I recommend doing this practice for as simple as jQuery events, form handling or as simple as any notification system. This just won't make things simple but makes codes much more manageable, easy understand, read or open f...

Global exception handling and custom logging in AspNet Core with MongoDB

In this, we would be looking into logging and global exception handling in the AspNet Core application with proper registration of logger and global exception handling. Custom logging The first step is to create a data model that we want to save into DB. Error log Data model These are few properties to do logging which could be extended or reduced based on need. public class ErrorLog { /// <summary> /// Gets or sets the Error log identifier. /// </summary> /// <value> /// The Error log identifier. /// </value> [BsonRepresentation(BsonType.ObjectId)] public ObjectId Id { get; set; /// <summary> /// Gets or sets the date. /// </summary> /// <value> /// The date. /// </value> public DateTime Date { get; set; } /// <summary> /// Gets or sets the thread. /// </summary> ...