Skip to main content

Efficient custom mapping from data model to ViewModel/Dto or vice versa with LINQ support

How many lines of codes we waste on mapping from one source to a destination like DataModel to ViewModel.  There are well-known Mappers available to do the same but nothing can come close in terms of performance by using manual mapping just that we need to write at too many places or takes a huge chunk of code lines in our main codes, may be under controllers, services or where ever you prefer projection in code.

The idea is to develop a proper way to deal with mappings. Some time back I had written code for manual mapping under LINQ queries. Manual model mapping - LINQ projection technique, this still works great. The idea is to create a cleaner solution as a whole new package for handling Mapping which can support general mappings between models and support of LINQ projection to select the limited number of rows as required.

Primary objectives of the implementation.
- A Data model to view model/DTO/or any other.
- view model/DTO/or any other to a data model.
- Support of LINQ projection without selecting all columns from a table.
- Support of IEnumerable.

The above items are compelling enough to create mapping structure with performance benefits.

Let's start with creations of interfaces to support One-way mapper, Two-way mapper, and support of LINQ queries in both case.

Basically, all we need is creation of interfaces and implementation of mapping classes based on models.

A simple IMapper implementation which simply converts from one model to other. It is simple enough not to have any kind of explanation.

 public interface IMapper<TSource, TResult>  
 {  
   /// <summary>  
   /// Maps the specified model.  
   /// </summary>  
   /// <param name="model">The model.</param>  
   /// <returns>Projection/Mapping from <paramref name="model"/> to a new type.</returns>  
   TResult Map(TSource model);  
 }  


IQueryMapper is for supporting LINQ projection, it is a kind of extension of above.

 public interface IQueryMapper<TSource, TResult>  
 {  
   /// <summary>  
   /// Gets the expression for projection/mapping.  
   /// </summary>  
   /// <value>  
   /// The expression for projection/mapping.  
   /// </value>  
   Expression<Func<TSource, TResult>> Expression { get; }  
 }  


ITwoWayMapper, It is opposite of  IMapper by inheriting the feature. Like if IMapper is for User to UserDto, this would allow having UserDto to User.

 /// <summary>  
 /// Two way mapping for models.  
 /// </summary>  
 /// <typeparam name="TFirst">The type of the first.</typeparam>  
 /// <typeparam name="TSecond">The type of the second.</typeparam>  
 /// <seealso cref="IMapper{TFirst, TSecond}" />  
 public interface ITwoWayMapper<TFirst, TSecond>  
     : IMapper<TFirst, TSecond>  
 {  
   /// <summary>  
   /// Maps the specified model.  
   /// </summary>  
   /// <param name="model">The model.</param>  
   /// <returns>Projection/Mapping from <paramref name="model"/> to a new type.</returns>  
   TFirst Map(TSecond model);  
 }  


IQueryTwoWayMapper, is similar to ITwoWayMapper but with LINQ support.

 public interface IQueryTwoWayMapper<TFirst, TSecond>  
   : IQueryMapper<TFirst, TSecond>  
 {  
   /// <summary>  
   /// Gets the reverse projection/mapping expression.  
   /// </summary>  
   /// <value>  
   /// The reverse projection/mapping expression.  
   /// </value>  
   Expression<Func<TSecond, TFirst>> ReverseExpression { get; }  
 }  


All these above implementations use Interface Segregation Principle principle, we would see advantages for them soon.

Based on above interfaces, we can create extension methods to map it to expressions or System.Func implementation based on need. I have not entirely tested extension methods based on above interfaces but it is really simple to extend based on a need to do something else. This is one of the major parts of Mapping Structure.

 /// <summary>  
 /// Extension methods for mapper  
 /// </summary>  
 public static class ExtensionMapper  
 {  
   /// <summary>  
   /// Maps the model from <typeparamref name="TSource"/> to <typeparamref name="TResult"/>.  
   /// </summary>  
   /// <typeparam name="TSource">The type of the source.</typeparam>  
   /// <typeparam name="TResult">The type of the result.</typeparam>  
   /// <param name="mapper">The mapper.</param>  
   /// <param name="source">The source.</param>  
   /// <returns>Projection from <typeparamref name="TSource"/> to <typeparamref name="TResult"/>.</returns>  
   public static IEnumerable<TResult> Map<TSource, TResult>(  
     this ITwoWayMapper<TSource, TResult> mapper,  
     IEnumerable<TSource> source)  
   {  
     return source.Select(val => mapper.Map(val));  
   }  
   /// <summary>  
   /// Maps the model from <typeparamref name="TSource"/> to <typeparamref name="TResult"/>.  
   /// </summary>  
   /// <typeparam name="TSource">The type of the source.</typeparam>  
   /// <typeparam name="TResult">The type of the result.</typeparam>  
   /// <param name="source">The source.</param>  
   /// <param name="mapper">The mapper.</param>  
   /// <returns>Projection from <typeparamref name="TSource"/> to <typeparamref name="TResult"/>.</returns>  
   public static IEnumerable<TResult> Map<TSource, TResult>(  
     this IQueryable<TSource> source,  
     IQueryTwoWayMapper<TSource, TResult> mapper)  
   {  
     return source.Select(mapper.Expression);  
   }  
   /// <summary>  
   /// Maps the model from <typeparamref name="TSource"/> to <typeparamref name="TResult"/>.  
   /// </summary>  
   /// <typeparam name="TSource">The type of the source.</typeparam>  
   /// <typeparam name="TResult">The type of the result.</typeparam>  
   /// <param name="mapper">The mapper.</param>  
   /// <param name="source">The source.</param>  
   /// <returns>Projection from <typeparamref name="TSource"/> to <typeparamref name="TResult"/>.</returns>  
   public static IEnumerable<TResult> Map<TSource, TResult>(  
     this ITwoWayMapper<TResult, TSource> mapper,  
     IEnumerable<TSource> source)  
   {  
     return source.Select(val => mapper.Map(val));  
   }  
   /// <summary>  
   /// Maps the model from <typeparamref name="TSource"/> to <typeparamref name="TResult"/>.  
   /// </summary>  
   /// <typeparam name="TSource">The type of the source.</typeparam>  
   /// <typeparam name="TResult">The type of the result.</typeparam>  
   /// <param name="source">The source.</param>  
   /// <param name="mapper">The mapper.</param>  
   /// <returns>Projection from <typeparamref name="TSource"/> to <typeparamref name="TResult"/>.</returns>  
   public static IEnumerable<TResult> Map<TSource, TResult>(  
     this IQueryable<TSource> source,  
     IQueryTwoWayMapper<TResult, TSource> mapper)  
   {  
     return source.Select(mapper.ReverseExpression);  
   }  
 }  


Implementation

Sample DTO

 public class Book  
 {  
   public string Name {get;set;}  
   public string Publisher {get;set;}  
 }  
 public class BookDto  
 {  
   public string BookName {get;set;}  
   public string BookPublisher {get;set;}  
 }  

A simple one-way mapper implementation of IMapper based on above models.

 public class BookMapper  
      : IMapper<BookDto, Book>  
 {  
      public Book Map(BookDto model)  
         => new Book  
         {  
           Name = model.BookName,  
           Publisher = model.BookPublisher  
         };  
 }  


Usage

 public ActionResult AddBook(BookDto model)  
 {  
      var bookMapper = new BookMapper();  
      var bookDataModel = bookMapper.Map(model);  
      // Code to insert book.  
 }  


Two-way with IQueryTwoWayMapper sample mapper implementation.

 public class BookMapper  
   : ITwoWayMapper<Book, BookDto>  
     , IQueryTwoWayMapper<Book, BookDto>  
 {  
   public Book Map(BookDto model)  
         => new Book  
         {  
           Name = model.BookName,  
           Publisher = model.BookPublisher  
         };  
   public BookDto Map(Book model)  
       => new BookDto  
       {  
         BookName = model.Name,  
         BookPublisher = model.Publisher  
       };  
   public Expression<Func<BookDto, Book>> ReverseExpression  
       => model  
       => new Book  
       {  
         Name = model.BookName,  
         Publisher = model.BookPublisher  
       };  
   public Expression<Func<Book, BookDto>> Expression  
       => model  
       => new BookDto  
       {  
         BookName = model.Name,  
         BookPublisher = model.Publisher  
       };  
 }  


With above codes, it is a bit confusing why similar type of codes are repeated for function and expression implementation. The thing is System.Func and general function cannot be truly converted to expression easily. If we directly try to pass Func than it would execute on CLR rather than SQL level which would result in the selection of all columns and then the projection. With Expressions, only required columns can be selected.

Also, Expression cannot be simply converted to Func since those can be really complex with multi-level of Expression Tree. If you still need a cleaner way and ready to compromise performance than this line can be used with expression compilation but I won't recommend going in that way.

 public BookDto Map(Book model) => Expression.Compile().Invoke(model);  


Implementation of above

The separation of interface allows us to use in any combination. Use, IMapper with IQueryMapper in a case of one-way mapping with LINQ queries. IMapper could be individually used like in the first example and in above we used all interface but just by inheriting two of them which depends upon their root inheritance.

 public ActionResult AddBook(BookDto model)  
 {  
      var bookMapper = new BookMapper();  
      var bookDataModel = bookMapper.Map(model);  
      // Projection from Context Book data to BookDto through Expression by using extension method.  
      var bookDtos = BookRepository.All().Select(bookMapper.Map());  
 }  


I have used the implementation as a concept but use as per your requirement, altering codes and further separation/removal of interface and extra implementation of Extension methods.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Using Redis distributed cache in dotnet core with helper extension methods

Redis cache is out process cache provider for a distributed environment. It is popular in Azure Cloud solution, but it also has a standalone application to operate upon in case of small enterprises application. How to install Redis Cache on a local machine? Redis can be used as a local cache server too on our local machines. At first install, Chocolatey https://chocolatey.org/ , to make installation of Redis easy. Also, the version under Chocolatey supports more commands and compatible with Official Cache package from Microsoft. After Chocolatey installation hit choco install redis-64 . Once the installation is done, we can start the server by running redis-server . Distributed Cache package and registration dotnet core provides IDistributedCache interface which can be overrided with our own implementation. That is one of the beauties of dotnet core, having DI implementation at heart of framework. There is already nuget package available to override IDistributedCache i...

Kendo MVC Grid DataSourceRequest with AutoMapper - Advance

The actual process to make DataSourceRequest compatible with AutoMapper was explained in my previous post  Kendo MVC Grid DataSourceRequest with AutoMapper , where we had created custom model binder attribute and in that property names were changed as data models. In this post we will be looking into using AutoMapper's Queryable extension to retrieve the results based on selected columns. When  Mapper.Map<RoleViewModel>(data)  is called it retrieves all column values from table. The Queryable extension provides a way to retrieve only selected columns from table. In this particular case based on properties of  RoleViewModel . The previous approach that we implemented is perfect as far as this article ( 3 Tips for Using Telerik Data Access and AutoMapper ) is concern about performance where it states: While this functionality allows you avoid writing explicit projection in to your LINQ query it has the same fatal flaw as doing so - it prevents the qu...

Architecture solution composting Repository Pattern, Unit Of Work, Dependency Injection, Factory Pattern and others

Project architecture is like garden, we plant the things in certain order and eventually they grow in similar manner. If things are planted well then they will all look(work) great and easier to manage. If they grow as cumbersome it would difficult to maintain and with time more problems would be happening in maintenance. There is no any fixed or known approach to decide project architecture and specially with Agile Methodology. In Agile Methodology, we cannot predict how our end products will look like similarly we cannot say a certain architecture will fit well for entire development lifespan for project. So, the best thing is to modify the architecture as per our application growth. I understand that it sounds good but will be far more problematic with actual development. If it is left as it is then more problems will arise with time. Just think about moving plant vs a full grown tree. Coming to technical side, In this article, I will be explaining about the various techniques ...

Trim text in MVC Core through Model Binder

Trimming text can be done on client side codes, but I believe it is most suitable on MVC Model Binder since it would be at one place on infrastructure level which would be free from any manual intervention of developer. This would allow every post request to be processed and converted to a trimmed string. Let us start by creating Model binder using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.ModelBinding; using System; using System.Threading.Tasks; public class TrimmingModelBinder : IModelBinder { private readonly IModelBinder FallbackBinder; public TrimmingModelBinder(IModelBinder fallbackBinder) { FallbackBinder = fallbackBinder ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(fallbackBinder)); } public Task BindModelAsync(ModelBindingContext bindingContext) { if (bindingContext == null) { throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(bindingContext)); } var valueProviderResult = bindingContext.ValueProvider.GetValue(bin...

C# Response files

Response files are similar to batch files, having some specific instruction. On execution they perform some predefined task based on instruction. Response file contains instruction to compile programs. If we have to build complex program through command line then response files are really helpful in development process. rsp is an extension for response files. By default, csc.rsp file exists under "Framework" folder Ex: C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319. csc.rsp contains long list of system references (dlls). Some contents under csc.rsp # Reference the common Framework libraries /r:Accessibility.dll /r:Microsoft.CSharp.dll /r:System.Configuration.dll /r:System.Configuration.Install.dll /r:System.Core.dll /r:System.Data.dll /r:System.Data.DataSetExtensions.dll /r:System.Data.Linq.dll .......... In same way we can have our own response file defined which might include some third party dll. Let's see an example. Suppose we have to create an appli...

Channel, ChannelReader and ChannelWriter to manage data streams in multi-threading environment

I came across Channel class while working with SignalR which looks really interesting. By looking into NuGet packages ( https://www.nuget.org/packages/System.Threading.Channels ), it seems just 4 months old. The Channel class provides infrastructure to have multiple reads and write simuletensely through it's Reader and Writer properties. This is where it is handy in case of SignalR where data streaming needs to be done but is not just limited to that but wherever something needs to be read/write/combination of both in a multi-threading environment. In my case with SignalR, I had to stream stock data at a regular interval of time. public ChannelReader<StockData> StreamStock() { var channel = Channel.CreateUnbounded<StockData>(); _stockManager.OnStockData = stockData => { channel.Writer.TryWrite(stockData); }; return channel.Reader; } The SignalR keeps return type of ChannelReader<StockData> open so that whatev...

Kendo MVC Grid DataSourceRequest with AutoMapper

Kendo Grid does not work directly with AutoMapper but could be managed by simple trick using mapping through ToDataSourceResult. The solution works fine until different filters are applied. The problems occurs because passed filters refer to view model properties where as database model properties are required after AutoMapper is implemented. So, the plan is to intercept DataSourceRequest  and modify names based on database model. To do that we are going to create implementation of  CustomModelBinderAttribute to catch calls and have our own implementation of DataSourceRequestAttribute from Kendo MVC. I will be using same source code from Kendo but will replace column names for different criteria for sort, filters, group etc. Let's first look into how that will be implemented. public ActionResult GetRoles([MyDataSourceRequest(GridId.RolesUserGrid)] DataSourceRequest request) { if (request == null) { throw new Argume...

Blazor 0.5.0 Interop JavaScript from C# and C# to JavaScript call

Blazor provides two-way communication from JS to C# and C# to JS which is called Interop. The version upgrade to Blazor 0.5.0 changed the approach in interactions between cshtml and JS files. The newer version simplifies JS calling by avoiding pre-registration of JS function. In this article, we would see how to call a JS method by passing multiple parameters from cshtml and parameterized call from JS to cshtml. The scenario that is used in this article has a Kendo AutoComplete to search book and populate information based on the selection. An example of a call to JS from cshtml await JSRuntime.Current.InvokeAsync<string>( "searchBook.Init", "#SearchTitle", new DotNetObjectRef(this)); Takeaways from the above example: - JSRuntime.Current give environment to execute out-process JS. - InvokeAsync is a function that would allow executing the JS function. - The searchBook.Init is a JS function call, we would see it in details in the second sec...

Making FluentValidation compatible with Swagger including Enum or fixed List support

FluentValidation is not directly compatible with Swagger API to validate models. But they do provide an interface through which we can compose Swagger validation manually. That means we look under FluentValidation validators and compose Swagger validator properties to make it compatible. More of all mapping by reading information from FluentValidation and setting it to Swagger Model Schema. These can be done on any custom validation from FluentValidation too just that proper schema property has to be available from Swagger. Custom validation from Enum/List values on FluentValidation using FluentValidation.Validators; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using static System.String; /// <summary> /// Validator as per list of items. /// </summary> /// <seealso cref="PropertyValidator" /> public class FixedListValidator : PropertyValidator { /// <summary> /// Gets the valid items /// <...

MongoDB navigation property or making it behave as ORM in .Net

This is an implementation to make models to have  navigation properties work like ORM does for us. What actually happens in ORM to make navigation properties work? Entity Framework has proxy classes implementation to allow lazy loading and eager loading implementation. While creating proxy classes it also changes definitions for actual classes to make navigation properties work to get values based on Model's for navigation properties. Most of ORMs work in same fashion like Telerik DataAccess has enhancer tool which changes class definition at compile time to enable navigation properties. In this implementation, we would retain the original class but we would have extension methods to allow initializing properties to have navigation proprieties work. Let's first create desire model on which we need to implement. I am picking up simple one-to-many relationship example from Person to Address. public class Person { public int PersonId { get; set; } ...