Skip to main content

Visual Studio 2015 Code Analyzer and configuration with StyleCop

What is Diagnostic/Code Analyzer?
To put it simply it is something similar to Resharper or Telerik JustCode. It analyzes codes while writing on code editor and suggest for improvements of codes through Squiggles, light icon and based on various severity.

How it works?

I had mentioned that it is similar to Resharper and Telerik JustCode but internal infrastructure is completely different.

It is dependent on new compiler Roslyn. Roslyn has a clever compile technique, unlike older version which makes it faster and flexible for dynamic compilation without the need of the entire code base. The structure is basically divided into two categories Syntax Tree, and Semantic Model. The syntax tree is related to syntaxes only it does not require any reference check. It can be related to DOM elements structure in case of HTML.  Syntax Tree consists of very fine details as simple as WhiteSpace under the code. The Semantic Model is kind of references of Syntax Tree in which it tries to resolve any dependencies of that code. Syntax tree analysis is very cheap in comparison to Semantic model. This is where Code Analyzer can be much more efficient in comparison of Resharper and Telerik JustCode versions.

What are benefits?
If you remember old FxCop or StyleCop, it used to get warnings, messages, and errors after building the application where as Analyzer works on Roslyn with Syntax Tree, through which we can see live status of codes. These also give Tooltips to quickly Refactor the code. In comparison of Resharper and Telerik JustCode, it is much faster since it has to depend on the certain area of code via Syntax tree and only referenced items of same through the Semantic model.

The other great benefit is since it does not need to depend on any tool, all team can follow same common decided conventions. In a case of ReSharper or other VS tools it may have inconsistency since team members can choose not to use that tool. It can be implemented through NuGet which means it would be available on source code and all team member has to follow the same convention.

How to use?

It is compatible with .Net Framework and Core version as well. All you need to do is to install your favorite Analyzer through NuGet and done. There are already tons of library available on NuGet Package Manager. Have a look on various libraries for same and use based on convention, style, library and technology.

The good old StyleCop and FxCop is being recreated to leverage Analyzers let us have a look on the usage of StyleCop.

  "dependencies": {
    "StyleCop.Analyzers": {
      "version": "1.1.0-beta001",
      "type": "build"

This is all it requires.

Rule configuration.

The rules can be tweaked as needed based on Rule identifier available for each and every error or messages. These are optional.

To do that need to put under project.json 
    "buildOptions": {
        "additionalArguments": [

These are the configuration files which can be configured as needed. Based on above given path it has to reside on root level.


  "$schema": "",
  "settings": {
    "documentationRules": {
      "documentInterfaces": true,
      "documentInternalElements": true


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<RuleSet Name="New Rule Set" Description=" " ToolsVersion="14.0">
  <Rules AnalyzerId="StyleCop.Analyzers" RuleNamespace="StyleCop.Analyzers">
    <Rule Id="SA0000" Action="Error" />
    <Rule Id="SA1005" Action="None" />
    <Rule Id="SA1028" Action="None" />
    <Rule Id="SA1101" Action="None" />
    <Rule Id="SA1200" Action="None" />
    <Rule Id="SA1208" Action="None" />
    <Rule Id="SA1210" Action="None" />
    <Rule Id="SA1633" Action="None" />
    <Rule Id="SA1124" Action="None" />
    <Rule Id="SA1649" Action="None" />
    <Rule Id="SA1401" Action="None" />
    <Rule Id="SA1513" Action="None" />
    <Rule Id="SA1512" Action="None" />
    <Rule Id="SA1202" Action="None" />
    <Rule Id="SA1108" Action="None" />
    <Rule Id="SA1116" Action="None" />

Helpful links:

Some other analyzers:

Popular posts from this blog

Architecture solution composting Repository Pattern, Unit Of Work, Dependency Injection, Factory Pattern and others

Project architecture is like garden, we plant the things in certain order and eventually they grow in similar manner. If things are planted well then they will all look(work) great and easier to manage. If they grow as cumbersome it would difficult to maintain and with time more problems would be happening in maintenance.

There is no any fixed or known approach to decide project architecture and specially with Agile Methodology. In Agile Methodology, we cannot predict how our end products will look like similarly we cannot say a certain architecture will fit well for entire development lifespan for project. So, the best thing is to modify the architecture as per our application growth. I understand that it sounds good but will be far more problematic with actual development. If it is left as it is then more problems will arise with time. Just think about moving plant vs a full grown tree.

Coming to technical side, In this article, I will be explaining about the various techniques tha…

LDAP with ASP.Net Identity Core in MVC with project.json

Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP), the name itself explain it. An application protocol used over an IP network to access the distributed directory information service.

The first and foremost thing is to add references for consuming LDAP. This has to be done by adding reference from Global Assembly Cache (GAC) into project.json

"frameworks": { "net461": { "frameworkAssemblies": { "System.DirectoryServices": "", "System.DirectoryServices.AccountManagement": "" } } },
These System.DirectoryServices and System.DirectoryServices.AccountManagement references are used to consume LDAP functionality.

It is always better to have an abstraction for irrelevant items in consuming part. For an example, the application does not need to know about PrincipalContext or any other dependent items from those two references to make it extensible. So, we can begin with some bas…

Configuring Ninject, Asp.Net Identity UserManager, DataProtectorTokenProvider with Owin

It can be bit tricky to configure both Ninject and Asp.Net Identity UserManager if some value is expected from DI to configure UserManager. We will look into configuring both and also use OwinContext to get UserManager.

As usual, all configuration need to be done on Startup.cs. It is just a convention but can be used with different name, the important thing is to decorate class with following attribute to make it Owin start-up:

[assembly: OwinStartup(typeof(MyProject.Web.Startup))]
Ninject configuration

Configuring Ninject kernel through method which would be used to register under Owin.

public IKernel CreateKernel() { var kernel = new StandardKernel(); try { //kernel.Bind<IHttpModule>().To<HttpApplicationInitializationHttpModule>(); // TODO: Put any other injection which are required. return kernel; } catch { kernel.Dispose(); throw; }…