Skip to main content

Configuring Ninject, Asp.Net Identity UserManager, DataProtectorTokenProvider with Owin

It can be bit tricky to configure both Ninject and Asp.Net Identity UserManager if some value is expected from DI to configure UserManager. We will look into configuring both and also use OwinContext to get UserManager.

As usual, all configuration need to be done on Startup.cs. It is just a convention but can be used with different name, the important thing is to decorate class with following attribute to make it Owin start-up:

 [assembly: OwinStartup(typeof(MyProject.Web.Startup))]  

Ninject configuration

Configuring Ninject kernel through method which would be used to register under Owin.

Startup.cs
     public IKernel CreateKernel()  
     {  
       var kernel = new StandardKernel();  
       try  
       {  
         //kernel.Bind<IHttpModule>().To<HttpApplicationInitializationHttpModule>();  
         // TODO: Put any other injection which are required.
         return kernel;  
       }  
       catch  
       {  
         kernel.Dispose();  
         throw;  
       }  
     }  

To register with Owin we need to have Ninject.Web.Common.OwinHost package which would provide an extension method for configuration with AppBuilder.

Startup.cs
     private IKernel kernel = null;  
     public void Configuration(IAppBuilder app)  
     {  
       kernel = CreateKernel();  
       app.UseNinjectMiddleware(() => kernel);
     }  

The kernel variable is created to save the Ninject configuration which can be used to get value from it.
Ex:

       var service = kernel.Get<IServiceLocater>();  
       setting = service.SystemService.GetSystemSetting();  


Asp.Net Identity User Manager Configuration

There is actually two way do configure it. The first to register Ninject with CreatePerOwinContext and retrieve kernel through Owin context parameter.

 app.CreatePerOwinContext(CreateKernel);  

and then

 app.CreatePerOwinContext<MyUserManager>((option, context) =>  
       {  
         var kernl = context.Get<IKernel>();  
         var setting = service.SystemService.GetSystemSetting();  
         var userStore = kernel.Get<IUserStore<MyUserDomain>>();  
         return new MyUserManager(userStore);  
       });  

The above is standard approach but while performance profiling I find issue on CreateKernel which gets keep disposing and calling multiple times even if we try to do in this way.

  app.CreatePerOwinContext(() => kernel); // using above variable but kept getting disposed.  

So, the best option is to create kernel variable like we did under Ninject Configuration section and utilizing same to get setting out of Ninject kernel.

MyUserManager.cs
  public static MyUserManager Create(IdentityFactoryOptions<MyUserManager> options,  
       IUserStore<MyUserDomain> userStore, UserPolicy userPolicy)  
     {  
       var manager = new MyUserManager(userStore);  

       // Settings that we want to have based on implementation of Manager class
       manager.UserPolicy = userPolicy; // Custom defined  
       manager.PasswordValidator = new CustomPasswordValidator(userPolicy);  
       manager.UserLockoutEnabledByDefault = false;  
       manager.DefaultAccountLockoutTimeSpan = TimeSpan.FromMinutes(userPolicy.DefaultAccountLockoutTimeSpan);  
       manager.MaxFailedAccessAttemptsBeforeLockout = userPolicy.FailedAttemptLockCount; 
 
       manager.UserTokenProvider = new DataProtectorTokenProvider<MyUserDomain, string>(  
         options.DataProtectionProvider.Create("Asp.Net Identity"))  
       {  
         TokenLifespan = TimeSpan.FromDays(userPolicy.TokenExpiryInDays)  
       };  

       return manager;  
     }  

Then simply register the context on Startup.cs

Startup.cs
 app.CreatePerOwinContext<MyUserManager>((options, context) =>  
       {  
         var userStore = kernel.Get<IUserStore<MyUserDomain>>();  
         return MyUserManager.Create(options, userStore, setting.UserPolicy);  
       });  

One general thing that I had not explained is to have proper initialization of DataProtectorTokenProvider. It is generally need to be initialized on Owin Startup, with IdentityFactoryOptions<MyUserManager> we are able to create data protection provider.

Consuming Asp.Net Identity User Manager

Now, we are all set to consume User Manager. Since, we have set it on Owin context, it can be used throughout of application by following approach:

 HttpContext.GetOwinContext().GetUserManager<MyUserManager>()  


Quick glance of entire Startup.cs
   public sealed class Startup  
   {  
     /// <summary>  
     /// Application level settings.  
     /// </summary>  
     private Setting setting;  

     /// <summary>  
     /// Ninject kernel for injection.  
     /// </summary>  
     private IKernel kernel = null;  

     /// <summary>  
     /// Configurations of the application.  
     /// </summary>  
     /// <param name="app">The application.</param>  
     public void Configuration(IAppBuilder app)  
     {  
       kernel = CreateKernel();  
       app.UseNinjectMiddleware(() => kernel);  

       // Populate setting from services.  
       var service = kernel.Get<IServiceLocater>();  
       setting = service.SystemService.GetSystemSetting();  

       app.CreatePerOwinContext<MyUserManager>(CreateUserManager);  
       ConfigureAuthentication(app);  
     }  

     /// <summary>  
     /// Creates the user manager.  
     /// </summary>  
     /// <param name="options">The options.</param>  
     /// <param name="context">The context.</param>  
     /// <returns>User manager instance.</returns>  
     private MyUserManager CreateUserManager(IdentityFactoryOptions<MyUserManager> options, IOwinContext context)  
     {  
       var userStore = kernel.Get<IUserStore<MyUserDomain>>();  
       return MyUserManager.Create(options, userStore, setting.UserPolicy);  
     }  

     /// <summary>  
     /// Configures the authentication.  
     /// </summary>  
     /// <param name="app">The application builder.</param>  
     private void ConfigureAuthentication(IAppBuilder app)  
     {  
       app.UseCookieAuthentication(new CookieAuthenticationOptions  
       {  
         AuthenticationType = DefaultAuthenticationTypes.ApplicationCookie,  
         LoginPath = new PathString("/Account/Login"),  
         SlidingExpiration = true,  
         ExpireTimeSpan = TimeSpan.FromMinutes(setting.System.Session.SessionTimeoutInMinutes)  
       });  
     }  

     /// <summary>  
     /// Creates the kernel.  
     /// </summary>  
     /// <returns></returns>  
     public IKernel CreateKernel()  
     {  
       var kernel = new StandardKernel();  
       try  
       {  
         //kernel.Bind<Func<IKernel>>().ToMethod(ctx => () => new Bootstrapper().Kernel);  
         //kernel.Bind<IHttpModule>().To<HttpApplicationInitializationHttpModule>();  
         // TODO: Put any other injection which are required.  
         return kernel;  
       }  
       catch  
       {  
         kernel.Dispose();  
         throw;  
       }  
     }  
   }  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Using Redis distributed cache in dotnet core with helper extension methods

Redis cache is out process cache provider for a distributed environment. It is popular in Azure Cloud solution, but it also has a standalone application to operate upon in case of small enterprises application. How to install Redis Cache on a local machine? Redis can be used as a local cache server too on our local machines. At first install, Chocolatey https://chocolatey.org/ , to make installation of Redis easy. Also, the version under Chocolatey supports more commands and compatible with Official Cache package from Microsoft. After Chocolatey installation hit choco install redis-64 . Once the installation is done, we can start the server by running redis-server . Distributed Cache package and registration dotnet core provides IDistributedCache interface which can be overrided with our own implementation. That is one of the beauties of dotnet core, having DI implementation at heart of framework. There is already nuget package available to override IDistributedCache i...

Kendo MVC Grid DataSourceRequest with AutoMapper - Advance

The actual process to make DataSourceRequest compatible with AutoMapper was explained in my previous post  Kendo MVC Grid DataSourceRequest with AutoMapper , where we had created custom model binder attribute and in that property names were changed as data models. In this post we will be looking into using AutoMapper's Queryable extension to retrieve the results based on selected columns. When  Mapper.Map<RoleViewModel>(data)  is called it retrieves all column values from table. The Queryable extension provides a way to retrieve only selected columns from table. In this particular case based on properties of  RoleViewModel . The previous approach that we implemented is perfect as far as this article ( 3 Tips for Using Telerik Data Access and AutoMapper ) is concern about performance where it states: While this functionality allows you avoid writing explicit projection in to your LINQ query it has the same fatal flaw as doing so - it prevents the qu...

Kendo MVC Grid DataSourceRequest with AutoMapper

Kendo Grid does not work directly with AutoMapper but could be managed by simple trick using mapping through ToDataSourceResult. The solution works fine until different filters are applied. The problems occurs because passed filters refer to view model properties where as database model properties are required after AutoMapper is implemented. So, the plan is to intercept DataSourceRequest  and modify names based on database model. To do that we are going to create implementation of  CustomModelBinderAttribute to catch calls and have our own implementation of DataSourceRequestAttribute from Kendo MVC. I will be using same source code from Kendo but will replace column names for different criteria for sort, filters, group etc. Let's first look into how that will be implemented. public ActionResult GetRoles([MyDataSourceRequest(GridId.RolesUserGrid)] DataSourceRequest request) { if (request == null) { throw new Argume...

Architecture solution composting Repository Pattern, Unit Of Work, Dependency Injection, Factory Pattern and others

Project architecture is like garden, we plant the things in certain order and eventually they grow in similar manner. If things are planted well then they will all look(work) great and easier to manage. If they grow as cumbersome it would difficult to maintain and with time more problems would be happening in maintenance. There is no any fixed or known approach to decide project architecture and specially with Agile Methodology. In Agile Methodology, we cannot predict how our end products will look like similarly we cannot say a certain architecture will fit well for entire development lifespan for project. So, the best thing is to modify the architecture as per our application growth. I understand that it sounds good but will be far more problematic with actual development. If it is left as it is then more problems will arise with time. Just think about moving plant vs a full grown tree. Coming to technical side, In this article, I will be explaining about the various techniques ...

C# Response files

Response files are similar to batch files, having some specific instruction. On execution they perform some predefined task based on instruction. Response file contains instruction to compile programs. If we have to build complex program through command line then response files are really helpful in development process. rsp is an extension for response files. By default, csc.rsp file exists under "Framework" folder Ex: C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319. csc.rsp contains long list of system references (dlls). Some contents under csc.rsp # Reference the common Framework libraries /r:Accessibility.dll /r:Microsoft.CSharp.dll /r:System.Configuration.dll /r:System.Configuration.Install.dll /r:System.Core.dll /r:System.Data.dll /r:System.Data.DataSetExtensions.dll /r:System.Data.Linq.dll .......... In same way we can have our own response file defined which might include some third party dll. Let's see an example. Suppose we have to create an appli...

Making FluentValidation compatible with Swagger including Enum or fixed List support

FluentValidation is not directly compatible with Swagger API to validate models. But they do provide an interface through which we can compose Swagger validation manually. That means we look under FluentValidation validators and compose Swagger validator properties to make it compatible. More of all mapping by reading information from FluentValidation and setting it to Swagger Model Schema. These can be done on any custom validation from FluentValidation too just that proper schema property has to be available from Swagger. Custom validation from Enum/List values on FluentValidation using FluentValidation.Validators; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using static System.String; /// <summary> /// Validator as per list of items. /// </summary> /// <seealso cref="PropertyValidator" /> public class FixedListValidator : PropertyValidator { /// <summary> /// Gets the valid items /// <...

Trim text in MVC Core through Model Binder

Trimming text can be done on client side codes, but I believe it is most suitable on MVC Model Binder since it would be at one place on infrastructure level which would be free from any manual intervention of developer. This would allow every post request to be processed and converted to a trimmed string. Let us start by creating Model binder using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.ModelBinding; using System; using System.Threading.Tasks; public class TrimmingModelBinder : IModelBinder { private readonly IModelBinder FallbackBinder; public TrimmingModelBinder(IModelBinder fallbackBinder) { FallbackBinder = fallbackBinder ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(fallbackBinder)); } public Task BindModelAsync(ModelBindingContext bindingContext) { if (bindingContext == null) { throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(bindingContext)); } var valueProviderResult = bindingContext.ValueProvider.GetValue(bin...

Channel, ChannelReader and ChannelWriter to manage data streams in multi-threading environment

I came across Channel class while working with SignalR which looks really interesting. By looking into NuGet packages ( https://www.nuget.org/packages/System.Threading.Channels ), it seems just 4 months old. The Channel class provides infrastructure to have multiple reads and write simuletensely through it's Reader and Writer properties. This is where it is handy in case of SignalR where data streaming needs to be done but is not just limited to that but wherever something needs to be read/write/combination of both in a multi-threading environment. In my case with SignalR, I had to stream stock data at a regular interval of time. public ChannelReader<StockData> StreamStock() { var channel = Channel.CreateUnbounded<StockData>(); _stockManager.OnStockData = stockData => { channel.Writer.TryWrite(stockData); }; return channel.Reader; } The SignalR keeps return type of ChannelReader<StockData> open so that whatev...

Blazor 0.5.0 Interop JavaScript from C# and C# to JavaScript call

Blazor provides two-way communication from JS to C# and C# to JS which is called Interop. The version upgrade to Blazor 0.5.0 changed the approach in interactions between cshtml and JS files. The newer version simplifies JS calling by avoiding pre-registration of JS function. In this article, we would see how to call a JS method by passing multiple parameters from cshtml and parameterized call from JS to cshtml. The scenario that is used in this article has a Kendo AutoComplete to search book and populate information based on the selection. An example of a call to JS from cshtml await JSRuntime.Current.InvokeAsync<string>( "searchBook.Init", "#SearchTitle", new DotNetObjectRef(this)); Takeaways from the above example: - JSRuntime.Current give environment to execute out-process JS. - InvokeAsync is a function that would allow executing the JS function. - The searchBook.Init is a JS function call, we would see it in details in the second sec...

Strongly typed SingalR on server and client end through TypeScript.

SignalR is a very flexible framework to create bidirectional communication between client and server. The general process that is followed won't allow to have strongly typed calls on the server and also in client code. We will look into how to make strongly typed calls on the server through interface and client end through TypeScript. SignalR - making strong type on server side code Since client-side methods are very dynamic in nature, so calling those from server side behaves similarly to allow any calls. SignalR Hubs are derived from Microsoft.AspNet.SignalR.Hub class, there is also a generic version available to follow typed items. Ex: The interface is the replication of possible calls that would be received on the client end and calling of client-side methods on server code. /// <summary> /// Client(JS) side chatting interface callbacks. /// </summary> public interface IChatHub { /// <summary> /// Gets the online users...