Skip to main content

Configuring Ninject, Asp.Net Identity UserManager, DataProtectorTokenProvider with Owin

It can be bit tricky to configure both Ninject and Asp.Net Identity UserManager if some value is expected from DI to configure UserManager. We will look into configuring both and also use OwinContext to get UserManager.

As usual, all configuration need to be done on Startup.cs. It is just a convention but can be used with different name, the important thing is to decorate class with following attribute to make it Owin start-up:

 [assembly: OwinStartup(typeof(MyProject.Web.Startup))]  

Ninject configuration

Configuring Ninject kernel through method which would be used to register under Owin.

Startup.cs
     public IKernel CreateKernel()  
     {  
       var kernel = new StandardKernel();  
       try  
       {  
         //kernel.Bind<IHttpModule>().To<HttpApplicationInitializationHttpModule>();  
         // TODO: Put any other injection which are required.
         return kernel;  
       }  
       catch  
       {  
         kernel.Dispose();  
         throw;  
       }  
     }  

To register with Owin we need to have Ninject.Web.Common.OwinHost package which would provide an extension method for configuration with AppBuilder.

Startup.cs
     private IKernel kernel = null;  
     public void Configuration(IAppBuilder app)  
     {  
       kernel = CreateKernel();  
       app.UseNinjectMiddleware(() => kernel);
     }  

The kernel variable is created to save the Ninject configuration which can be used to get value from it.
Ex:

       var service = kernel.Get<IServiceLocater>();  
       setting = service.SystemService.GetSystemSetting();  


Asp.Net Identity User Manager Configuration

There is actually two way do configure it. The first to register Ninject with CreatePerOwinContext and retrieve kernel through Owin context parameter.

 app.CreatePerOwinContext(CreateKernel);  

and then

 app.CreatePerOwinContext<MyUserManager>((option, context) =>  
       {  
         var kernl = context.Get<IKernel>();  
         var setting = service.SystemService.GetSystemSetting();  
         var userStore = kernel.Get<IUserStore<MyUserDomain>>();  
         return new MyUserManager(userStore);  
       });  

The above is standard approach but while performance profiling I find issue on CreateKernel which gets keep disposing and calling multiple times even if we try to do in this way.

  app.CreatePerOwinContext(() => kernel); // using above variable but kept getting disposed.  

So, the best option is to create kernel variable like we did under Ninject Configuration section and utilizing same to get setting out of Ninject kernel.

MyUserManager.cs
  public static MyUserManager Create(IdentityFactoryOptions<MyUserManager> options,  
       IUserStore<MyUserDomain> userStore, UserPolicy userPolicy)  
     {  
       var manager = new MyUserManager(userStore);  

       // Settings that we want to have based on implementation of Manager class
       manager.UserPolicy = userPolicy; // Custom defined  
       manager.PasswordValidator = new CustomPasswordValidator(userPolicy);  
       manager.UserLockoutEnabledByDefault = false;  
       manager.DefaultAccountLockoutTimeSpan = TimeSpan.FromMinutes(userPolicy.DefaultAccountLockoutTimeSpan);  
       manager.MaxFailedAccessAttemptsBeforeLockout = userPolicy.FailedAttemptLockCount; 
 
       manager.UserTokenProvider = new DataProtectorTokenProvider<MyUserDomain, string>(  
         options.DataProtectionProvider.Create("Asp.Net Identity"))  
       {  
         TokenLifespan = TimeSpan.FromDays(userPolicy.TokenExpiryInDays)  
       };  

       return manager;  
     }  

Then simply register the context on Startup.cs

Startup.cs
 app.CreatePerOwinContext<MyUserManager>((options, context) =>  
       {  
         var userStore = kernel.Get<IUserStore<MyUserDomain>>();  
         return MyUserManager.Create(options, userStore, setting.UserPolicy);  
       });  

One general thing that I had not explained is to have proper initialization of DataProtectorTokenProvider. It is generally need to be initialized on Owin Startup, with IdentityFactoryOptions<MyUserManager> we are able to create data protection provider.

Consuming Asp.Net Identity User Manager

Now, we are all set to consume User Manager. Since, we have set it on Owin context, it can be used throughout of application by following approach:

 HttpContext.GetOwinContext().GetUserManager<MyUserManager>()  


Quick glance of entire Startup.cs
   public sealed class Startup  
   {  
     /// <summary>  
     /// Application level settings.  
     /// </summary>  
     private Setting setting;  

     /// <summary>  
     /// Ninject kernel for injection.  
     /// </summary>  
     private IKernel kernel = null;  

     /// <summary>  
     /// Configurations of the application.  
     /// </summary>  
     /// <param name="app">The application.</param>  
     public void Configuration(IAppBuilder app)  
     {  
       kernel = CreateKernel();  
       app.UseNinjectMiddleware(() => kernel);  

       // Populate setting from services.  
       var service = kernel.Get<IServiceLocater>();  
       setting = service.SystemService.GetSystemSetting();  

       app.CreatePerOwinContext<MyUserManager>(CreateUserManager);  
       ConfigureAuthentication(app);  
     }  

     /// <summary>  
     /// Creates the user manager.  
     /// </summary>  
     /// <param name="options">The options.</param>  
     /// <param name="context">The context.</param>  
     /// <returns>User manager instance.</returns>  
     private MyUserManager CreateUserManager(IdentityFactoryOptions<MyUserManager> options, IOwinContext context)  
     {  
       var userStore = kernel.Get<IUserStore<MyUserDomain>>();  
       return MyUserManager.Create(options, userStore, setting.UserPolicy);  
     }  

     /// <summary>  
     /// Configures the authentication.  
     /// </summary>  
     /// <param name="app">The application builder.</param>  
     private void ConfigureAuthentication(IAppBuilder app)  
     {  
       app.UseCookieAuthentication(new CookieAuthenticationOptions  
       {  
         AuthenticationType = DefaultAuthenticationTypes.ApplicationCookie,  
         LoginPath = new PathString("/Account/Login"),  
         SlidingExpiration = true,  
         ExpireTimeSpan = TimeSpan.FromMinutes(setting.System.Session.SessionTimeoutInMinutes)  
       });  
     }  

     /// <summary>  
     /// Creates the kernel.  
     /// </summary>  
     /// <returns></returns>  
     public IKernel CreateKernel()  
     {  
       var kernel = new StandardKernel();  
       try  
       {  
         //kernel.Bind<Func<IKernel>>().ToMethod(ctx => () => new Bootstrapper().Kernel);  
         //kernel.Bind<IHttpModule>().To<HttpApplicationInitializationHttpModule>();  
         // TODO: Put any other injection which are required.  
         return kernel;  
       }  
       catch  
       {  
         kernel.Dispose();  
         throw;  
       }  
     }  
   }  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Using Redis distributed cache in dotnet core with helper extension methods

Redis cache is out process cache provider for a distributed environment. It is popular in Azure Cloud solution, but it also has a standalone application to operate upon in case of small enterprises application. How to install Redis Cache on a local machine? Redis can be used as a local cache server too on our local machines. At first install, Chocolatey https://chocolatey.org/ , to make installation of Redis easy. Also, the version under Chocolatey supports more commands and compatible with Official Cache package from Microsoft. After Chocolatey installation hit choco install redis-64 . Once the installation is done, we can start the server by running redis-server . Distributed Cache package and registration dotnet core provides IDistributedCache interface which can be overrided with our own implementation. That is one of the beauties of dotnet core, having DI implementation at heart of framework. There is already nuget package available to override IDistributedCache i...

Centralized model validation both for MVC/WebApi and SPA client-side validation using FluentValidation

Validation is one of the crucial parts of any application. It has to validate on both client side and server side requests. What are target features or implementation from this article? Model validation for any given model. Centralized/One code for validation on both server-side and client-side. Automatic validation of model without writing any extra codes on/under actions for validation.  NO EXTRA/ANY codes on client-side to validate any form. Compatible with SPA. Can be compatible with any client-side validation framework/library. Like Angular Reactive form validation or any jquery validation libraries. Tools used in the implementation? FluentValidation : I feel DataAnnotation validation are excellent and simple to use, but in case of complex validation or writing any custom validations are always tricker and need to write a lot of codes to achieve whereas FluentValidations are simple even in case of complex validation. Generally, we need to validate inc...

Architecture solution composting Repository Pattern, Unit Of Work, Dependency Injection, Factory Pattern and others

Project architecture is like garden, we plant the things in certain order and eventually they grow in similar manner. If things are planted well then they will all look(work) great and easier to manage. If they grow as cumbersome it would difficult to maintain and with time more problems would be happening in maintenance. There is no any fixed or known approach to decide project architecture and specially with Agile Methodology. In Agile Methodology, we cannot predict how our end products will look like similarly we cannot say a certain architecture will fit well for entire development lifespan for project. So, the best thing is to modify the architecture as per our application growth. I understand that it sounds good but will be far more problematic with actual development. If it is left as it is then more problems will arise with time. Just think about moving plant vs a full grown tree. Coming to technical side, In this article, I will be explaining about the various techniques ...

Elegantly dealing with TimeZones in MVC Core / WebApi

In any new application handling TimeZone/DateTime is mostly least priority and generally, if someone is concerned then it would be handled by using DateTime.UtcNow on codes while creating current dates and converting incoming Date to UTC to save on servers. Basically, the process is followed by saving DateTime to UTC format in a database and keep converting data to native format based on user region or single region in the application's presentation layer. The above is tedious work and have to be followed religiously. If any developer misses out the manual conversion, then that area of code/view would not work. With newer frameworks, there are flexible ways to deal/intercept incoming or outgoing calls to simplify conversion of TimeZones. These are steps/process to achieve it. 1. Central code for storing user's state about TimeZone. Also, central code for conversion logic based on TimeZones. 2. Dependency injection for the above class to ...

Trim text in MVC Core through Model Binder

Trimming text can be done on client side codes, but I believe it is most suitable on MVC Model Binder since it would be at one place on infrastructure level which would be free from any manual intervention of developer. This would allow every post request to be processed and converted to a trimmed string. Let us start by creating Model binder using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.ModelBinding; using System; using System.Threading.Tasks; public class TrimmingModelBinder : IModelBinder { private readonly IModelBinder FallbackBinder; public TrimmingModelBinder(IModelBinder fallbackBinder) { FallbackBinder = fallbackBinder ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(fallbackBinder)); } public Task BindModelAsync(ModelBindingContext bindingContext) { if (bindingContext == null) { throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(bindingContext)); } var valueProviderResult = bindingContext.ValueProvider.GetValue(bin...

Data seed for the application with EF, MongoDB or any other ORM.

Most of ORMs has moved to Code first approach where everything is derived/initialized from codes rather than DB side. In this situation, it is better to set data through codes only. We would be looking through simple technique where we would be Seeding data through Codes. I would be using UnitOfWork and Repository pattern for implementing Data Seeding technique. This can be applied to any data source MongoDB, EF, or any other ORM or DB. Things we would be doing. - Creating a base class for easy usage. - Interface for Seed function for any future enhancements. - Individual seed classes. - Configuration to call all seeds. - AspNet core configuration to Seed data through Seed configuration. Creating a base class for easy usage public abstract class BaseSeed<TModel> where TModel : class { protected readonly IMyProjectUnitOfWork MyProjectUnitOfWork; public BaseSeed(IMyProjectUnitOfWork MyProjectUnitOfWork) { ...

Storing and restoring Kendo Grid state from Database

There is no any built in way to store entire grid state into database and restore back again with all filters, groups, aggregates, page and page size. At first, I was trying to restore only filters by looking through DataSourceRequest. DataSourceRequest is kind of communication medium between client and server for the operation we do on grid. All the request comes via DataSourceRequest. In previous approach, I was trying to store IFileDescriptor interface which come with class FileDescriptor by looping through filters and serializing into string for saving into database but this IFileDescriptor can also contain CompositeFilterDescriptor which can be nested in nested object which are very tricky to handle. So, I had decompiled entire Kendo.MVC library and found out that all Kendo MVC controls are derived from “JsonObject”. It is there own implementation with ”Serialize” abstract function and “ToJson” function. In controls they are overriding “Serialize” method which depicts t...

Global exception handling and custom logging in AspNet Core with MongoDB

In this, we would be looking into logging and global exception handling in the AspNet Core application with proper registration of logger and global exception handling. Custom logging The first step is to create a data model that we want to save into DB. Error log Data model These are few properties to do logging which could be extended or reduced based on need. public class ErrorLog { /// <summary> /// Gets or sets the Error log identifier. /// </summary> /// <value> /// The Error log identifier. /// </value> [BsonRepresentation(BsonType.ObjectId)] public ObjectId Id { get; set; /// <summary> /// Gets or sets the date. /// </summary> /// <value> /// The date. /// </value> public DateTime Date { get; set; } /// <summary> /// Gets or sets the thread. /// </summary> ...

ASP.NET Core environment aware strongly typed configuration in MongoDB

This is targetted to save in MongoDB but the technique can be used in any targetted backend with key value setting based on  IConfigurationProvider Data property. Basically, the provided interface works based Data property having a type as IDictionary<string, string>. So, whatever class we create it has to be serialized based on same. We would simplify this by creating an abstract class to have certain serialization logic. This is sample setting for the application. If you check the structure,  Setting is the main class and nested items are Azure, Message, Email, Twilio. The key value needs to be composed based on parent and child classes separated by colons. Just like above, we need to populate settings from our different setting classes. Implementation can be grouped in these sections. - Application level configuration classes. - Registration of configuration on ASP.NET Core. - Environment level configuration, this would little mixed with abo...

main method return value

Mainly we used to write "static void main" for entry point in console application. Placement of void denotes return type. In main function we could have "int" too but what does it really mean. "int main" signifies return type as integer. The return type of main function tells about execution status of application. Even if we have specified void as return type then it would be marked as successful program execution. If we mark int as return type then we are able to control the execution status. Now, what is the benefit of making main function as int. Windows OS saves result in  %ERRORLEVEL% environment variable of OS. If we create batch file and execute application through it then we will able to get status and based on result we can trigger something else through batch file. Let's suppose we have created program called TEST.EXE. Batch file script: @echo off REM Execute main program REM TEST.EXE @if  "%ERRORLEVEL%" == "0...