Skip to main content

Migrating old AutoMapper codes to 4.2 version with instance based approach

In AutoMapper 4.2 version, static implementation is removed with instance approach. It could be a nightmare to migrate the codes to the newer version with instance approach. I will be putting up guide for migrating codes from the older version to instance approach if someone has used Profile based approach.

Previous implementation (old implementation)

Profile based implementation mapping

 public class UserProfileMapping  
      : Profile  
 {  
      protected override void Configure()  
      {  
           Mapper.CreateMap<UserProfile, PreferenceViewModel>()  
             .ForMember(vm => vm.UserId, m => m.MapFrom(profile => profile.Id));  
      }  
 }  

Single class for registering all AutoMapper configuration

 public static class AutoMapperConfiguration  
 {  
      public static void Configure()  
      {  
           Mapper.Initialize(cfg =>  
           {  
                cfg.AddProfile(new UserProfileMapping());  
           });  
      }  
 }  

The global mapping initialization under global.asax

 AutoMapperConfiguration.Configure();  

Usage under controllers

 var dbUserProfile = // call for getting info from DB.  
 var preference = new PreferenceViewModel();  
 Mapper.Map(dbUserProfile, preference);  

Automapper Queryable Extensions implementation

 var dbQuery = // Db call  
 dbQuery.Project().To<PreferenceViewModel>()  


These above processes were old approach with static methods calls.
In the newer version, there has to be instance based approach, the biggest advantage is dependency injection. I am hoping the API would improve and with this new move someone can create a standard for Mapping the domain models and view models later.


AutoMapper new implementation based on instance approach

Let's start with the order that I followed with the older approach. I will be using constructor dependency injection to wire the whole process.

Profile based implementation mapping

 public class UserProfileMapping   
      : Profile  
 {    
      private readonly IMapperConfiguration MappingConfiguration;  
      public UserProfileMapping(IMapperConfiguration config)  
      {  
           MappingConfiguration = config;  
      }  
      protected override void Configure()  
      {  
           MappingConfiguration  
                .CreateMap<UserProfile, PreferenceViewModel>()  
                .ForMember(vm => vm.UserId, m => m.MapFrom(profile => profile.Id));  
      }  
 }  

The IMapperConfiguration is a new interface for mapping models which we would be checking at a later stage.

Single class for registering all AutoMapper configuration

 public class AutoMapperConfiguration  
 {  
      public AutoMapperConfiguration(IMapperConfiguration mapperConfiguration)  
      {  
           Configure(mapperConfiguration);  
      }  
      public void Configure(IMapperConfiguration mapperConfiguration)  
      {  
           mapperConfiguration.AddProfile(new UserProfileMapping(mapperConfiguration));  
      }  
 }  

If you check changes, the static declaration is removed from class and function both. Implementation is also changed based on dependency injection.


Dependency injection initialization through Ninject (The global mapping initialization under global.asax)

I am including possible mappings which may depend based on application. You can choose based on need.

 // AutoMapper mapping  
 kernel.Bind<MapperConfiguration>()  
       .ToSelf()  
       .InRequestScope()  
       .WithConstructorArgument<Action<IMapperConfiguration>>(  
             cfg => new AutoMapperConfiguration(cfg));  
 kernel.Bind<IConfigurationProvider>().ToMethod(ctx => ctx.Kernel.Get<MapperConfiguration>());  
 kernel.Bind<IMapper>().ToMethod(maper => kernel.Get<MapperConfiguration>().CreateMapper()).InSingletonScope();  
 kernel.Bind<IExpressionBuilder>().ToConstructor(ctx => new ExpressionBuilder(kernel.Get<MapperConfiguration>()));  

The MapperConfiguration has Action<IMapperConfiguration> type constructor parameter. In this, the anonymous action is created and IMapperConfiguration is created to be passed as a parameter for AutoMapperConfiguration .

The other key point is the creation of IMapper implementation instance through CreateMapper() method. This IMapper will be passed across all application to consume mappings.

IConfigurationProvider and IExpressionBuilder can be used for projecting LINQ queries to targetted mapped model.

Usage under controllers

In the controllers, the constructor parameters are taking care of instances  for mappers. Mainly, IMapper is used of mapping objects.

 public class AccountController  
      : Controller  
 {  
      private readonly IMapper Mapper;  
      public AccountController(IMapper modelMapper)  
      {  
           // Initialization codes  
      }  
      public ActionResult UserPreference()  
      {  
           var dbUserProfile = // call for getting info from DB.   
           var preference = new PreferenceViewModel();   
           Mapper.Map(dbUserProfile, preference);   
           // Code  
      }  
 }  


Automapper Queryable Extensions implementation

For extension method ideally, IExpressionBuilder needs to be used for LINQ projection but due to some issue or incompatibilty with QueryableExtensions, I am using IConfigurationProvider to do projection.

 public class AccountController  
      : Controller  
 {  
      private readonly IConfigurationProvider ConfigurationProvider;  
      public AccountController(IMapper modelMapper,  
           IConfigurationProvider configurationProvider)  
      {  
           // Initialization codes  
      }  
      public ActionResult UserPreference()  
      {  
           var dbQuery = // Db call   
           var res = dbQuery.ProjectTo<PreferenceViewModel>(ConfigurationProvider)   
           // Code  
      }  
 }  



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Using Redis distributed cache in dotnet core with helper extension methods

Redis cache is out process cache provider for a distributed environment. It is popular in Azure Cloud solution, but it also has a standalone application to operate upon in case of small enterprises application. How to install Redis Cache on a local machine? Redis can be used as a local cache server too on our local machines. At first install, Chocolatey https://chocolatey.org/ , to make installation of Redis easy. Also, the version under Chocolatey supports more commands and compatible with Official Cache package from Microsoft. After Chocolatey installation hit choco install redis-64 . Once the installation is done, we can start the server by running redis-server . Distributed Cache package and registration dotnet core provides IDistributedCache interface which can be overrided with our own implementation. That is one of the beauties of dotnet core, having DI implementation at heart of framework. There is already nuget package available to override IDistributedCache i...

Data seed for the application with EF, MongoDB or any other ORM.

Most of ORMs has moved to Code first approach where everything is derived/initialized from codes rather than DB side. In this situation, it is better to set data through codes only. We would be looking through simple technique where we would be Seeding data through Codes. I would be using UnitOfWork and Repository pattern for implementing Data Seeding technique. This can be applied to any data source MongoDB, EF, or any other ORM or DB. Things we would be doing. - Creating a base class for easy usage. - Interface for Seed function for any future enhancements. - Individual seed classes. - Configuration to call all seeds. - AspNet core configuration to Seed data through Seed configuration. Creating a base class for easy usage public abstract class BaseSeed<TModel> where TModel : class { protected readonly IMyProjectUnitOfWork MyProjectUnitOfWork; public BaseSeed(IMyProjectUnitOfWork MyProjectUnitOfWork) { ...

Centralized model validation both for MVC/WebApi and SPA client-side validation using FluentValidation

Validation is one of the crucial parts of any application. It has to validate on both client side and server side requests. What are target features or implementation from this article? Model validation for any given model. Centralized/One code for validation on both server-side and client-side. Automatic validation of model without writing any extra codes on/under actions for validation.  NO EXTRA/ANY codes on client-side to validate any form. Compatible with SPA. Can be compatible with any client-side validation framework/library. Like Angular Reactive form validation or any jquery validation libraries. Tools used in the implementation? FluentValidation : I feel DataAnnotation validation are excellent and simple to use, but in case of complex validation or writing any custom validations are always tricker and need to write a lot of codes to achieve whereas FluentValidations are simple even in case of complex validation. Generally, we need to validate inc...

Architecture solution composting Repository Pattern, Unit Of Work, Dependency Injection, Factory Pattern and others

Project architecture is like garden, we plant the things in certain order and eventually they grow in similar manner. If things are planted well then they will all look(work) great and easier to manage. If they grow as cumbersome it would difficult to maintain and with time more problems would be happening in maintenance. There is no any fixed or known approach to decide project architecture and specially with Agile Methodology. In Agile Methodology, we cannot predict how our end products will look like similarly we cannot say a certain architecture will fit well for entire development lifespan for project. So, the best thing is to modify the architecture as per our application growth. I understand that it sounds good but will be far more problematic with actual development. If it is left as it is then more problems will arise with time. Just think about moving plant vs a full grown tree. Coming to technical side, In this article, I will be explaining about the various techniques ...

Elegantly dealing with TimeZones in MVC Core / WebApi

In any new application handling TimeZone/DateTime is mostly least priority and generally, if someone is concerned then it would be handled by using DateTime.UtcNow on codes while creating current dates and converting incoming Date to UTC to save on servers. Basically, the process is followed by saving DateTime to UTC format in a database and keep converting data to native format based on user region or single region in the application's presentation layer. The above is tedious work and have to be followed religiously. If any developer misses out the manual conversion, then that area of code/view would not work. With newer frameworks, there are flexible ways to deal/intercept incoming or outgoing calls to simplify conversion of TimeZones. These are steps/process to achieve it. 1. Central code for storing user's state about TimeZone. Also, central code for conversion logic based on TimeZones. 2. Dependency injection for the above class to ...

Trim text in MVC Core through Model Binder

Trimming text can be done on client side codes, but I believe it is most suitable on MVC Model Binder since it would be at one place on infrastructure level which would be free from any manual intervention of developer. This would allow every post request to be processed and converted to a trimmed string. Let us start by creating Model binder using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.ModelBinding; using System; using System.Threading.Tasks; public class TrimmingModelBinder : IModelBinder { private readonly IModelBinder FallbackBinder; public TrimmingModelBinder(IModelBinder fallbackBinder) { FallbackBinder = fallbackBinder ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(fallbackBinder)); } public Task BindModelAsync(ModelBindingContext bindingContext) { if (bindingContext == null) { throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(bindingContext)); } var valueProviderResult = bindingContext.ValueProvider.GetValue(bin...

main method return value

Mainly we used to write "static void main" for entry point in console application. Placement of void denotes return type. In main function we could have "int" too but what does it really mean. "int main" signifies return type as integer. The return type of main function tells about execution status of application. Even if we have specified void as return type then it would be marked as successful program execution. If we mark int as return type then we are able to control the execution status. Now, what is the benefit of making main function as int. Windows OS saves result in  %ERRORLEVEL% environment variable of OS. If we create batch file and execute application through it then we will able to get status and based on result we can trigger something else through batch file. Let's suppose we have created program called TEST.EXE. Batch file script: @echo off REM Execute main program REM TEST.EXE @if  "%ERRORLEVEL%" == "0...

Global exception handling and custom logging in AspNet Core with MongoDB

In this, we would be looking into logging and global exception handling in the AspNet Core application with proper registration of logger and global exception handling. Custom logging The first step is to create a data model that we want to save into DB. Error log Data model These are few properties to do logging which could be extended or reduced based on need. public class ErrorLog { /// <summary> /// Gets or sets the Error log identifier. /// </summary> /// <value> /// The Error log identifier. /// </value> [BsonRepresentation(BsonType.ObjectId)] public ObjectId Id { get; set; /// <summary> /// Gets or sets the date. /// </summary> /// <value> /// The date. /// </value> public DateTime Date { get; set; } /// <summary> /// Gets or sets the thread. /// </summary> ...

Custom authorization on class, action/function, code, area level under Asp.Net MVC application

With evolution of ASP.Net MVC there are lot of inbuilt feature came and evolved with time. One of those is Authorization and Custom Authorization. The in-built function is sufficient enough to handle anonymous user restriction, user based on there name, specific roles for user with just single class AuthorizeAttribute . To implement we need to decorate attribute on any given class, action based on need. Example: [Authorize] public ActionResult Test() { } By just providing  Authorize  attribute anonymous user are restricted. It has Roles  and Users  property parameters to restrict access based on certain role or user which can accept multiple values by comma separated as string format. In one of the situation, I got chance to built an authorization where roles keep changing. Administrator can add new role, delete any role or modify existing role. In that situation we cannot map roles with codes. So, there were two way to achieve by creating group ...

ASP.NET Core environment aware strongly typed configuration in MongoDB

This is targetted to save in MongoDB but the technique can be used in any targetted backend with key value setting based on  IConfigurationProvider Data property. Basically, the provided interface works based Data property having a type as IDictionary<string, string>. So, whatever class we create it has to be serialized based on same. We would simplify this by creating an abstract class to have certain serialization logic. This is sample setting for the application. If you check the structure,  Setting is the main class and nested items are Azure, Message, Email, Twilio. The key value needs to be composed based on parent and child classes separated by colons. Just like above, we need to populate settings from our different setting classes. Implementation can be grouped in these sections. - Application level configuration classes. - Registration of configuration on ASP.NET Core. - Environment level configuration, this would little mixed with abo...