Skip to main content

Optimization through WeakReference

WeakReference is a new element added into 4.5 framework, but it was available in Java from the earlier stage only. So, this article could be useful for .Net, Java, and Android as well.

What is it?
It is nothing more than a class but what special about is to interact with Garbage Collector in a certain way which could help out in optimization.

Scenario
We all know that static members are created and shared throughout the application and life cycle by maintaining only single instance. Possibly it can useful in cases where data need to be frequently accessed but what about those that doesn't need to be frequently accessed all times. Those data might be resource hungry data so static or some kind of caching mechanism is required. Storing something in static members or caching increases memory footprint for the application. This is once situation, but there might be other situation as well.
WeekReference is a technique to hook up member with Garbage collector to retrieve actual object if it is not garbage collected. That means we can get the object if it is not garbage collected and re-create new one if it is not there in memory. This will allow object to be garbage collected and at same time create new item if does not exists which would be great under high traffic with frequent data access by keeping memory footprint under control in high and low traffic.

Coding
Theoretically it  looks complex but it is much easier on the implementation side. Just creation of values and setting under the WeekReference.
I have repeated some code to make it look simple at first glance.

   private static WeakReference<List<string>> WeekRefObj;  
   public static List<string> GetObject()  
   {  
     List<string> values;  
     if (WeekRefObj == null)  
     {  
       // TODO: Create new resource hungry object.  
       values = new List<string>();  
       WeekRefObj = new WeakReference<List<string>>(values);  
       return values;  
     }  
     if (WeekRefObj.TryGetTarget(out values))  
     {  
       return values;  
     }  
     else  
     {  
       // TODO: Create new resource hungry object.  
       values = new List<string>();  
       WeekRefObj.SetTarget(values);  
       return values;  
     }  
   }  

WeakReference has one parameter constructor which takes the actual values.
 WeekRefObj = new WeakReference<List<string>>(values);       

TryGetTarget is a function to get the value if it is not garbage collected and the SetTarget is for setting the new value.

These are the only three things that we need to know for coding.

Going to next stage
Since the implementation is much simple but codes increase a little. This is an extension wrapper method to make it more simple.

  /// <summary>  
   /// Gets or add the <see cref="WeakReference"/> object.  
   /// </summary>  
   /// <typeparam name="T">The type of the object need to save or get.</typeparam>  
   /// <param name="weekReference">The week reference object.</param>  
   /// <param name="getItemCallback">The get item callback for <see cref="WeakReference"/> value.</param>  
   /// <returns><see cref="WeakReference"/> value.</returns>  
   public static T GetOrAdd<T>(this WeakReference<T> weekReference, Func<T> getItemCallback)  
     where T : class  
   {  
     if (weekReference == null)  
     {  
       weekReference = new WeakReference<T>(default(T));  
     }  
     T value;  
     if (weekReference.TryGetTarget(out value))  
     {  
       return value;  
     }  
     else  
     {  
       if (getItemCallback == null)  
       {  
         throw new ArgumentNullException("getItemCallback");  
       }  
       value = getItemCallback();  
       weekReference.SetTarget(value);  
       return value;  
     }  
   }  

Usage

      private static WeakReference<List<string>> ModelPropertyMapping = null;  
      var modelMapping = ModelPropertyMapping.GetOrAdd(() =>  
      {  
           // TODO: Create new resource hungry object.  
           var mapping = new List<string>();  
           return mapping;  
      });  

The extension method would take care of object creation based on need.

SOURCE: http://www.mindfiresolutions.com/Code-optimization-through-WeekReference-2693.php

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Handling JSON DateTime format on Asp.Net Core

This is a very simple trick to handle JSON date format on AspNet Core by global settings. This can be applicable for the older version as well. In a newer version by default, .Net depends upon Newtonsoft to process any JSON data. Newtonsoft depends upon Newtonsoft.Json.Converters.IsoDateTimeConverter class for processing date which in turns adds timezone for JSON data format. There is a global setting available for same that can be adjusted according to requirement. So, for example, we want to set default formatting to US format, we just need this code. services.AddMvc() .AddJsonOptions(options => { options.SerializerSettings.DateTimeZoneHandling = "MM/dd/yyyy HH:mm:ss"; });

Elegantly dealing with TimeZones in MVC Core / WebApi

In any new application handling TimeZone/DateTime is mostly least priority and generally, if someone is concerned then it would be handled by using DateTime.UtcNow on codes while creating current dates and converting incoming Date to UTC to save on servers. Basically, the process is followed by saving DateTime to UTC format in a database and keep converting data to native format based on user region or single region in the application's presentation layer. The above is tedious work and have to be followed religiously. If any developer misses out the manual conversion, then that area of code/view would not work. With newer frameworks, there are flexible ways to deal/intercept incoming or outgoing calls to simplify conversion of TimeZones. These are steps/process to achieve it. 1. Central code for storing user's state about TimeZone. Also, central code for conversion logic based on TimeZones. 2. Dependency injection for the above class to ...

Data seed for the application with EF, MongoDB or any other ORM.

Most of ORMs has moved to Code first approach where everything is derived/initialized from codes rather than DB side. In this situation, it is better to set data through codes only. We would be looking through simple technique where we would be Seeding data through Codes. I would be using UnitOfWork and Repository pattern for implementing Data Seeding technique. This can be applied to any data source MongoDB, EF, or any other ORM or DB. Things we would be doing. - Creating a base class for easy usage. - Interface for Seed function for any future enhancements. - Individual seed classes. - Configuration to call all seeds. - AspNet core configuration to Seed data through Seed configuration. Creating a base class for easy usage public abstract class BaseSeed<TModel> where TModel : class { protected readonly IMyProjectUnitOfWork MyProjectUnitOfWork; public BaseSeed(IMyProjectUnitOfWork MyProjectUnitOfWork) { ...

Global exception handling and custom logging in AspNet Core with MongoDB

In this, we would be looking into logging and global exception handling in the AspNet Core application with proper registration of logger and global exception handling. Custom logging The first step is to create a data model that we want to save into DB. Error log Data model These are few properties to do logging which could be extended or reduced based on need. public class ErrorLog { /// <summary> /// Gets or sets the Error log identifier. /// </summary> /// <value> /// The Error log identifier. /// </value> [BsonRepresentation(BsonType.ObjectId)] public ObjectId Id { get; set; /// <summary> /// Gets or sets the date. /// </summary> /// <value> /// The date. /// </value> public DateTime Date { get; set; } /// <summary> /// Gets or sets the thread. /// </summary> ...

Trim text in MVC Core through Model Binder

Trimming text can be done on client side codes, but I believe it is most suitable on MVC Model Binder since it would be at one place on infrastructure level which would be free from any manual intervention of developer. This would allow every post request to be processed and converted to a trimmed string. Let us start by creating Model binder using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.ModelBinding; using System; using System.Threading.Tasks; public class TrimmingModelBinder : IModelBinder { private readonly IModelBinder FallbackBinder; public TrimmingModelBinder(IModelBinder fallbackBinder) { FallbackBinder = fallbackBinder ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(fallbackBinder)); } public Task BindModelAsync(ModelBindingContext bindingContext) { if (bindingContext == null) { throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(bindingContext)); } var valueProviderResult = bindingContext.ValueProvider.GetValue(bin...

Using Redis distributed cache in dotnet core with helper extension methods

Redis cache is out process cache provider for a distributed environment. It is popular in Azure Cloud solution, but it also has a standalone application to operate upon in case of small enterprises application. How to install Redis Cache on a local machine? Redis can be used as a local cache server too on our local machines. At first install, Chocolatey https://chocolatey.org/ , to make installation of Redis easy. Also, the version under Chocolatey supports more commands and compatible with Official Cache package from Microsoft. After Chocolatey installation hit choco install redis-64 . Once the installation is done, we can start the server by running redis-server . Distributed Cache package and registration dotnet core provides IDistributedCache interface which can be overrided with our own implementation. That is one of the beauties of dotnet core, having DI implementation at heart of framework. There is already nuget package available to override IDistributedCache i...

Centralized model validation both for MVC/WebApi and SPA client-side validation using FluentValidation

Validation is one of the crucial parts of any application. It has to validate on both client side and server side requests. What are target features or implementation from this article? Model validation for any given model. Centralized/One code for validation on both server-side and client-side. Automatic validation of model without writing any extra codes on/under actions for validation.  NO EXTRA/ANY codes on client-side to validate any form. Compatible with SPA. Can be compatible with any client-side validation framework/library. Like Angular Reactive form validation or any jquery validation libraries. Tools used in the implementation? FluentValidation : I feel DataAnnotation validation are excellent and simple to use, but in case of complex validation or writing any custom validations are always tricker and need to write a lot of codes to achieve whereas FluentValidations are simple even in case of complex validation. Generally, we need to validate inc...

Channel, ChannelReader and ChannelWriter to manage data streams in multi-threading environment

I came across Channel class while working with SignalR which looks really interesting. By looking into NuGet packages ( https://www.nuget.org/packages/System.Threading.Channels ), it seems just 4 months old. The Channel class provides infrastructure to have multiple reads and write simuletensely through it's Reader and Writer properties. This is where it is handy in case of SignalR where data streaming needs to be done but is not just limited to that but wherever something needs to be read/write/combination of both in a multi-threading environment. In my case with SignalR, I had to stream stock data at a regular interval of time. public ChannelReader<StockData> StreamStock() { var channel = Channel.CreateUnbounded<StockData>(); _stockManager.OnStockData = stockData => { channel.Writer.TryWrite(stockData); }; return channel.Reader; } The SignalR keeps return type of ChannelReader<StockData> open so that whatev...

Dependency Injection through XML configuration and XML transformation through SlowCheetah

Dependency Injection (DI) is a design pattern to change definition by substituting object without changing code for the application. The most popular DI type is to construct classes based on certain interface and pass actual object on constructor level. What are we trying to do? We will be looking into a way to achieve dependency injection through XML configuration based on  build selection . The implemented classes derived through interface will get switched based on build selection. Where to use it? I really hate making dependencies with something specific which can be changed later on. In my case, Azure environment. I believe Azure is more like a platform where we can host the application rather then integrating the application with Azure. What if client decided to switch to other hosting environment, in that case we got to change every piece of code wherever Azure SDKs are referred. The above one is merely an example. We can use this approach on many other item as wel...

Unit Of Work injection through Asp.Net Core Dependency Injection

This article is not directly related to UnitOfWork but leveraging Asp.Net Core Dependency Injection to consume Unit Of Work. In one of the previous article about project architecture, I was not very satisfied with the approach for Unit Of Work implementation for initialization of repository even if with some advantage. Here is old code for UnitOfWork. public sealed partial class MyProjectUnitOfWork : UnitOfWork<DbContext>, IMyProjectUnitOfWork { public MyProjectUnitOfWork(IContextFactory<DbContext> contextFactory) : base(contextFactory) { } /// <summary> /// BookRepository holder /// </summary> private MyProject.DB.Repository.BookRepository _bookRepository; /// <summary> /// Gets the BookRepository repository. /// </summary> /// <value> /// The BookRepository repository. /// </value> MyProject.Interface.Repositor...