Skip to main content

Extending WhenAny,WhenAll like feature to get the task as soon as it completes

While working with list of task, we only get two built in options to retrieve task info for completion. First is WhenAny and other WhenAll. WhenAny can be used when any of the given tasks gets completed first where as WhenAll notifies when all of the task gets completed. There is no option to know each task as soon as it gets completed.

I was going through Pro Asynchronous Programming with .NET book which shows better option to deal with notification of task completion efficiently.

To return the task on completion, TaskCompletionSource will be used . Through TaskCompletionSource, Task could be created and with provided inbuilt methods outcome can be handled. This can be also helpful to wrap up legacy codes as well to built up task.

Let's directly look in to core code to return task based on completion.

 /// <summary>  
     /// Order by completion for Task.  
     /// </summary>  
     /// <typeparam name="T">Return type</typeparam>  
     /// <param name="tasks">The tasks.</param>  
     /// <returns></returns>  
     /// <exception cref="System.ArgumentNullException">tasks</exception>  
     /// <exception cref="System.ArithmeticException">Must have at least one task</exception>  
     public static IEnumerable<Task<T>> OrderByCompletion<T>(this IEnumerable<Task<T>> tasks)  
     {  
       if (tasks == null)  
       {  
         throw new ArgumentNullException("tasks");  
       }  
       var allTasks = tasks.ToList();  
       if (!allTasks.Any())  
       {  
         throw new ArithmeticException("Must have at least one task");  
       }  
       // Create list of TaskCompletionSource  
       var taskCompletionSources = new List<TaskCompletionSource<T>>(allTasks.Count);  
       for (int tskCtr = 0; tskCtr < allTasks.Count; tskCtr++)  
       {  
         taskCompletionSources.Add(new TaskCompletionSource<T>());  
       }  
       int nextCompletdTask = -1;  
       for (int nTask = 0; nTask < allTasks.Count; nTask++)  
       {  
         taskCompletionSources[nTask] = new TaskCompletionSource<T>();  
         allTasks[nTask].ContinueWith(tsk =>  
         {  
           // Thread safe increment of variable  
           int taskToComplete = Interlocked.Increment(ref nextCompletdTask);  
           switch (tsk.Status)  
           {  
             case TaskStatus.Canceled:  
               taskCompletionSources[taskToComplete].SetCanceled();  
               break;  
             case TaskStatus.Faulted:  
               // InnerException is used to avoid AggregateException  
               taskCompletionSources[taskToComplete].SetException(tsk.Exception.InnerException);  
               break;  
             case TaskStatus.RanToCompletion:  
               taskCompletionSources[taskToComplete].SetResult(tsk.Result);  
               break;  
           }  
         }, TaskContinuationOptions.ExecuteSynchronously);  
       }  
       return taskCompletionSources.Select(src => src.Task);  
     }  

In the above code at first, list of TaskCompletionSource created based on number of tasks. Afterwards, task continuation is done for each task and result of task is transformed with the help of methods from TaskCompletionSource.

You might worried about TaskContinuationOptions.ExecuteSynchronously .This is on task continuation and the block of code just composing task which is perfectly fine and it won't block the code.

Now above extension function can be attached with any list of task by using OrderByCompletion. Let's see with example:

     private static void Main(string[] args)  
     {  
       var uriList = new List<string>()  
       {  
         "http://www.google.com",  
         "http://www.yahoo.com",  
         "http://www.msn.com",  
         "http://www.bing.com",  
         "http://vikutech.blogspot.in",  
       };  
       var tasks = GetDownloadedContentTaskAsync(uriList);  
       foreach (var task in tasks.OrderByCompletion())  
       {  
         Console.WriteLine(task.Result);  
       }  
     }  
     /// <summary>  
     /// Gets the downloaded content asynchronous as task.  
     /// </summary>  
     /// <param name="urlString">List of URLs.</param>  
     /// <returns>Content of downloaded string</returns>  
     private static IEnumerable<Task<string>> GetDownloadedContentTaskAsync(IEnumerable<string> urlStrings)  
     {  
       foreach (var url in urlStrings)  
       {  
         var client = new WebClient();  
         yield return client.DownloadStringTaskAsync(new Uri(url));  
         // TODO: Check sequence of program sequence  
         //yield return Task<string>.Factory.StartNew(() =>  
         //{  
         //  Task.Delay(4000);  
         //  return url;  
         //});  
       }  
     }  

The code is creating list of task and looping it to get the results from task when any task is getting completed in any sequence.
Source code: https://www.dropbox.com/s/9xemmci3ey40qug/TaskCompletionSequence.zip

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Elegantly dealing with TimeZones in MVC Core / WebApi

In any new application handling TimeZone/DateTime is mostly least priority and generally, if someone is concerned then it would be handled by using DateTime.UtcNow on codes while creating current dates and converting incoming Date to UTC to save on servers. Basically, the process is followed by saving DateTime to UTC format in a database and keep converting data to native format based on user region or single region in the application's presentation layer. The above is tedious work and have to be followed religiously. If any developer misses out the manual conversion, then that area of code/view would not work. With newer frameworks, there are flexible ways to deal/intercept incoming or outgoing calls to simplify conversion of TimeZones. These are steps/process to achieve it. 1. Central code for storing user's state about TimeZone. Also, central code for conversion logic based on TimeZones. 2. Dependency injection for the above class to ...

Trim text in MVC Core through Model Binder

Trimming text can be done on client side codes, but I believe it is most suitable on MVC Model Binder since it would be at one place on infrastructure level which would be free from any manual intervention of developer. This would allow every post request to be processed and converted to a trimmed string. Let us start by creating Model binder using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.ModelBinding; using System; using System.Threading.Tasks; public class TrimmingModelBinder : IModelBinder { private readonly IModelBinder FallbackBinder; public TrimmingModelBinder(IModelBinder fallbackBinder) { FallbackBinder = fallbackBinder ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(fallbackBinder)); } public Task BindModelAsync(ModelBindingContext bindingContext) { if (bindingContext == null) { throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(bindingContext)); } var valueProviderResult = bindingContext.ValueProvider.GetValue(bin...

Handling JSON DateTime format on Asp.Net Core

This is a very simple trick to handle JSON date format on AspNet Core by global settings. This can be applicable for the older version as well. In a newer version by default, .Net depends upon Newtonsoft to process any JSON data. Newtonsoft depends upon Newtonsoft.Json.Converters.IsoDateTimeConverter class for processing date which in turns adds timezone for JSON data format. There is a global setting available for same that can be adjusted according to requirement. So, for example, we want to set default formatting to US format, we just need this code. services.AddMvc() .AddJsonOptions(options => { options.SerializerSettings.DateTimeZoneHandling = "MM/dd/yyyy HH:mm:ss"; });

Centralized model validation both for MVC/WebApi and SPA client-side validation using FluentValidation

Validation is one of the crucial parts of any application. It has to validate on both client side and server side requests. What are target features or implementation from this article? Model validation for any given model. Centralized/One code for validation on both server-side and client-side. Automatic validation of model without writing any extra codes on/under actions for validation.  NO EXTRA/ANY codes on client-side to validate any form. Compatible with SPA. Can be compatible with any client-side validation framework/library. Like Angular Reactive form validation or any jquery validation libraries. Tools used in the implementation? FluentValidation : I feel DataAnnotation validation are excellent and simple to use, but in case of complex validation or writing any custom validations are always tricker and need to write a lot of codes to achieve whereas FluentValidations are simple even in case of complex validation. Generally, we need to validate inc...

LDAP with ASP.Net Identity Core in MVC with project.json

Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP), the name itself explain it. An application protocol used over an IP network to access the distributed directory information service. The first and foremost thing is to add references for consuming LDAP. This has to be done by adding reference from Global Assembly Cache (GAC) into project.json "frameworks": { "net461": { "frameworkAssemblies": { "System.DirectoryServices": "4.0.0.0", "System.DirectoryServices.AccountManagement": "4.0.0.0" } } }, These  System.DirectoryServices  and  System.DirectoryServices.AccountManagement  references are used to consume LDAP functionality. It is always better to have an abstraction for irrelevant items in consuming part. For an example, the application does not need to know about PrincipalContext or any other dependent items from those two references to make it extensible. So, we can begin wi...

Channel, ChannelReader and ChannelWriter to manage data streams in multi-threading environment

I came across Channel class while working with SignalR which looks really interesting. By looking into NuGet packages ( https://www.nuget.org/packages/System.Threading.Channels ), it seems just 4 months old. The Channel class provides infrastructure to have multiple reads and write simuletensely through it's Reader and Writer properties. This is where it is handy in case of SignalR where data streaming needs to be done but is not just limited to that but wherever something needs to be read/write/combination of both in a multi-threading environment. In my case with SignalR, I had to stream stock data at a regular interval of time. public ChannelReader<StockData> StreamStock() { var channel = Channel.CreateUnbounded<StockData>(); _stockManager.OnStockData = stockData => { channel.Writer.TryWrite(stockData); }; return channel.Reader; } The SignalR keeps return type of ChannelReader<StockData> open so that whatev...

Global exception handling and custom logging in AspNet Core with MongoDB

In this, we would be looking into logging and global exception handling in the AspNet Core application with proper registration of logger and global exception handling. Custom logging The first step is to create a data model that we want to save into DB. Error log Data model These are few properties to do logging which could be extended or reduced based on need. public class ErrorLog { /// <summary> /// Gets or sets the Error log identifier. /// </summary> /// <value> /// The Error log identifier. /// </value> [BsonRepresentation(BsonType.ObjectId)] public ObjectId Id { get; set; /// <summary> /// Gets or sets the date. /// </summary> /// <value> /// The date. /// </value> public DateTime Date { get; set; } /// <summary> /// Gets or sets the thread. /// </summary> ...

Kendo MVC Grid DataSourceRequest with AutoMapper

Kendo Grid does not work directly with AutoMapper but could be managed by simple trick using mapping through ToDataSourceResult. The solution works fine until different filters are applied. The problems occurs because passed filters refer to view model properties where as database model properties are required after AutoMapper is implemented. So, the plan is to intercept DataSourceRequest  and modify names based on database model. To do that we are going to create implementation of  CustomModelBinderAttribute to catch calls and have our own implementation of DataSourceRequestAttribute from Kendo MVC. I will be using same source code from Kendo but will replace column names for different criteria for sort, filters, group etc. Let's first look into how that will be implemented. public ActionResult GetRoles([MyDataSourceRequest(GridId.RolesUserGrid)] DataSourceRequest request) { if (request == null) { throw new Argume...

Blazor 0.5.0 Interop JavaScript from C# and C# to JavaScript call

Blazor provides two-way communication from JS to C# and C# to JS which is called Interop. The version upgrade to Blazor 0.5.0 changed the approach in interactions between cshtml and JS files. The newer version simplifies JS calling by avoiding pre-registration of JS function. In this article, we would see how to call a JS method by passing multiple parameters from cshtml and parameterized call from JS to cshtml. The scenario that is used in this article has a Kendo AutoComplete to search book and populate information based on the selection. An example of a call to JS from cshtml await JSRuntime.Current.InvokeAsync<string>( "searchBook.Init", "#SearchTitle", new DotNetObjectRef(this)); Takeaways from the above example: - JSRuntime.Current give environment to execute out-process JS. - InvokeAsync is a function that would allow executing the JS function. - The searchBook.Init is a JS function call, we would see it in details in the second sec...

Architecture solution composting Repository Pattern, Unit Of Work, Dependency Injection, Factory Pattern and others

Project architecture is like garden, we plant the things in certain order and eventually they grow in similar manner. If things are planted well then they will all look(work) great and easier to manage. If they grow as cumbersome it would difficult to maintain and with time more problems would be happening in maintenance. There is no any fixed or known approach to decide project architecture and specially with Agile Methodology. In Agile Methodology, we cannot predict how our end products will look like similarly we cannot say a certain architecture will fit well for entire development lifespan for project. So, the best thing is to modify the architecture as per our application growth. I understand that it sounds good but will be far more problematic with actual development. If it is left as it is then more problems will arise with time. Just think about moving plant vs a full grown tree. Coming to technical side, In this article, I will be explaining about the various techniques ...