Skip to main content

Easy way to parse SQL data reader objects

Many a times, I have seen that people end up writing lot of codes to read from SQL data reader or there is no fail safe mechanism to handle, if parse fails out.

In this article, I will try to cover up above issue and implement uniform way to handle things with fail safe mechanism using TryParse approach. Mainly, I will extend inbuilt try parse mechanism comes with .Net. Int.TryParse and similar type of methods was introduced in 2.0 Framework, so the code should be compatible with 2.0 or higher framework.

Let's directly dive into usage since we have just single function DbTryParse. I will be explaining function on later stage.
We can use with fail safe mechanism where some values are not properly parsed then row will get skipped or in normal way, we define some default value and move ahead with other rows.

 int id;  
 string val;  
 double dbl;  
 reader["id"].DbTryParse(out id, int.TryParse, 89);  
 reader["val"].DbTryParse(out val, "NA");  
 reader["doubleTest"].DbTryParse(out dbl, double.TryParse);  

I have tried with integer, string and double in similar way other types of variable can be used as well.
In this, I am reading integer Id column and sending logic for parsing with int.TryParse. If parse fails then it will set 100 as a default, this is optional parameter. Check out double parsing where we are not setting the default value.

Since we do not have inbuilt function like TryParse for string and it's a reference type. There is no need of handler and it is implemented in different way that we will see it later.

 reader["val"].DbTryParse(out val, "NA");  

If we want to skip rows on failure of any parse, then we could use:

 if (reader["id"].DbTryParse(out id, int.TryParse) &&  
 reader["val"].DbTryParse(out val) &&  
 reader["doubleTest"].DbTryParse(out dbl, double.TryParse))  
 {  
     Console.WriteLine("Parsing successful");  
 }  
 else  
 {  
     Console.WriteLine("Parsing failed.");  
 }  

That is all we need for parsing. The single DbTryParse is taking care of every possible parses.

Let's look into the implementation part. If we see all TryParse from .Net they accept string as first parameter and then the out parameter to parse value. For that a TryParseHandler<T> delegate wrapper is created. The generic parse functions are restricted with struct type which takes care of value type. The same function is overloaded to handle string type.

Here are codes:

   public static class CommonExtensionMethods  
   {  
     /// <summary>  
     /// Try parse handler  
     /// </summary>  
     /// <typeparam name="T">The result type</typeparam>  
     /// <param name="value">The string literal.</param>  
     /// <param name="result">The result of typecasting.</param>  
     /// <returns>True, if typecasting is successful, else false.</returns>  
     public delegate bool TryParseHandler<T>(string value, out T result);  
     /// <summary>  
     /// Generic try parse.  
     /// </summary>  
     /// <typeparam name="T">Type of the value</typeparam>  
     /// <param name="value">The string literal.</param>  
     /// <param name="parsedValue">The parsed value.</param>  
     /// <param name="handler">The type casting handler.</param>  
     /// <param name="defaultValue">The default value. This value will be set in case of failed parsing.</param>  
     /// <returns>Parsed object</returns>  
     /// <exception cref="System.ArgumentNullException">handler</exception>  
     public static bool TryParse<T>(this string value, out T parsedValue, TryParseHandler<T> handler,  
       T defaultValue = default(T))  
       where T : struct  
     {  
       if (handler == null)  
       {  
         throw new ArgumentNullException("handler");  
       }  
       if (String.IsNullOrEmpty(value))  
       {  
         parsedValue = defaultValue;  
         return false;  
       }  
       return handler(value, out parsedValue);  
     }  
     /// <summary>  
     /// Generic try parse for databases object.  
     /// </summary>  
     /// <typeparam name="T">The type of object for parsing value</typeparam>  
     /// <param name="val">The value.</param>  
     /// <param name="parsedValue">The parsed value.</param>  
     /// <param name="handler">The parsing handler.</param>  
     /// <param name="defaultValue">The default value. This value will be set in case of failed parsing.</param>  
     /// <returns>  
     /// Parsed object  
     /// </returns>  
     public static bool DbTryParse<T>(this object val, out T parsedValue, TryParseHandler<T> handler  
       , T defaultValue = default(T))  
       where T : struct  
     {  
       if (val == DBNull.Value)  
       {  
         parsedValue = defaultValue;  
         return false;  
       }  
       return Convert.ToString(val).TryParse(out parsedValue, handler, defaultValue);  
     }  
     /// <summary>  
     /// Databases object parsing to string.  
     /// </summary>  
     /// <param name="val">The value.</param>  
     /// <param name="parsedValue">The parsed value.</param>  
     /// <param name="defaultValue">The default value. This value will be set in case of failed parsing.</param>  
     /// <returns>String representation of parsed object</returns>  
     public static bool DbTryParse(this object val, out string parsedValue  
       , string defaultValue = null)  
     {  
       if (val == DBNull.Value)  
       {  
         parsedValue = defaultValue;  
         return false;  
       }  
       parsedValue = Convert.ToString(val) ?? defaultValue;  
       return parsedValue == defaultValue ? false : true;  
     }  
     /// <summary>  
     /// Databases object parsing to string.  
     /// </summary>  
     /// <param name="val">The value.</param>  
     /// <param name="defaultValue">The default value. This value will be set in case of failed parsing.</param>  
     /// <returns>String representation of given object</returns>  
     public static string DbParse(this object val, string defaultValue = null)  
     {  
       return val == DBNull.Value ? defaultValue : Convert.ToString(val) ?? defaultValue;  
     }  
   }  

Source: http://www.mindfiresolutions.com/Database-Reader-Object-Parsing-in-NET-2673.php

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Elegantly dealing with TimeZones in MVC Core / WebApi

In any new application handling TimeZone/DateTime is mostly least priority and generally, if someone is concerned then it would be handled by using DateTime.UtcNow on codes while creating current dates and converting incoming Date to UTC to save on servers. Basically, the process is followed by saving DateTime to UTC format in a database and keep converting data to native format based on user region or single region in the application's presentation layer. The above is tedious work and have to be followed religiously. If any developer misses out the manual conversion, then that area of code/view would not work. With newer frameworks, there are flexible ways to deal/intercept incoming or outgoing calls to simplify conversion of TimeZones. These are steps/process to achieve it. 1. Central code for storing user's state about TimeZone. Also, central code for conversion logic based on TimeZones. 2. Dependency injection for the above class to be able to use global

Handling JSON DateTime format on Asp.Net Core

This is a very simple trick to handle JSON date format on AspNet Core by global settings. This can be applicable for the older version as well. In a newer version by default, .Net depends upon Newtonsoft to process any JSON data. Newtonsoft depends upon Newtonsoft.Json.Converters.IsoDateTimeConverter class for processing date which in turns adds timezone for JSON data format. There is a global setting available for same that can be adjusted according to requirement. So, for example, we want to set default formatting to US format, we just need this code. services.AddMvc() .AddJsonOptions(options => { options.SerializerSettings.DateTimeZoneHandling = "MM/dd/yyyy HH:mm:ss"; });

Making FluentValidation compatible with Swagger including Enum or fixed List support

FluentValidation is not directly compatible with Swagger API to validate models. But they do provide an interface through which we can compose Swagger validation manually. That means we look under FluentValidation validators and compose Swagger validator properties to make it compatible. More of all mapping by reading information from FluentValidation and setting it to Swagger Model Schema. These can be done on any custom validation from FluentValidation too just that proper schema property has to be available from Swagger. Custom validation from Enum/List values on FluentValidation using FluentValidation.Validators; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using static System.String; /// <summary> /// Validator as per list of items. /// </summary> /// <seealso cref="PropertyValidator" /> public class FixedListValidator : PropertyValidator { /// <summary> /// Gets the valid items /// <

Kendo MVC Grid DataSourceRequest with AutoMapper

Kendo Grid does not work directly with AutoMapper but could be managed by simple trick using mapping through ToDataSourceResult. The solution works fine until different filters are applied. The problems occurs because passed filters refer to view model properties where as database model properties are required after AutoMapper is implemented. So, the plan is to intercept DataSourceRequest  and modify names based on database model. To do that we are going to create implementation of  CustomModelBinderAttribute to catch calls and have our own implementation of DataSourceRequestAttribute from Kendo MVC. I will be using same source code from Kendo but will replace column names for different criteria for sort, filters, group etc. Let's first look into how that will be implemented. public ActionResult GetRoles([MyDataSourceRequest(GridId.RolesUserGrid)] DataSourceRequest request) { if (request == null) { throw new ArgumentNullExce

LDAP with ASP.Net Identity Core in MVC with project.json

Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP), the name itself explain it. An application protocol used over an IP network to access the distributed directory information service. The first and foremost thing is to add references for consuming LDAP. This has to be done by adding reference from Global Assembly Cache (GAC) into project.json "frameworks": { "net461": { "frameworkAssemblies": { "System.DirectoryServices": "4.0.0.0", "System.DirectoryServices.AccountManagement": "4.0.0.0" } } }, These  System.DirectoryServices  and  System.DirectoryServices.AccountManagement  references are used to consume LDAP functionality. It is always better to have an abstraction for irrelevant items in consuming part. For an example, the application does not need to know about PrincipalContext or any other dependent items from those two references to make it extensible. So, we can begin wi

Using Redis distributed cache in dotnet core with helper extension methods

Redis cache is out process cache provider for a distributed environment. It is popular in Azure Cloud solution, but it also has a standalone application to operate upon in case of small enterprises application. How to install Redis Cache on a local machine? Redis can be used as a local cache server too on our local machines. At first install, Chocolatey https://chocolatey.org/ , to make installation of Redis easy. Also, the version under Chocolatey supports more commands and compatible with Official Cache package from Microsoft. After Chocolatey installation hit choco install redis-64 . Once the installation is done, we can start the server by running redis-server . Distributed Cache package and registration dotnet core provides IDistributedCache interface which can be overrided with our own implementation. That is one of the beauties of dotnet core, having DI implementation at heart of framework. There is already nuget package available to override IDistributedCache i

Data seed for the application with EF, MongoDB or any other ORM.

Most of ORMs has moved to Code first approach where everything is derived/initialized from codes rather than DB side. In this situation, it is better to set data through codes only. We would be looking through simple technique where we would be Seeding data through Codes. I would be using UnitOfWork and Repository pattern for implementing Data Seeding technique. This can be applied to any data source MongoDB, EF, or any other ORM or DB. Things we would be doing. - Creating a base class for easy usage. - Interface for Seed function for any future enhancements. - Individual seed classes. - Configuration to call all seeds. - AspNet core configuration to Seed data through Seed configuration. Creating a base class for easy usage public abstract class BaseSeed<TModel> where TModel : class { protected readonly IMyProjectUnitOfWork MyProjectUnitOfWork; public BaseSeed(IMyProjectUnitOfWork MyProjectUnitOfWork) { MyProject

Trim text in MVC Core through Model Binder

Trimming text can be done on client side codes, but I believe it is most suitable on MVC Model Binder since it would be at one place on infrastructure level which would be free from any manual intervention of developer. This would allow every post request to be processed and converted to a trimmed string. Let us start by creating Model binder using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.ModelBinding; using System; using System.Threading.Tasks; public class TrimmingModelBinder : IModelBinder { private readonly IModelBinder FallbackBinder; public TrimmingModelBinder(IModelBinder fallbackBinder) { FallbackBinder = fallbackBinder ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(fallbackBinder)); } public Task BindModelAsync(ModelBindingContext bindingContext) { if (bindingContext == null) { throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(bindingContext)); } var valueProviderResult = bindingContext.ValueProvider.GetValue(bin

Storing and restoring Kendo Grid state from Database

There is no any built in way to store entire grid state into database and restore back again with all filters, groups, aggregates, page and page size. At first, I was trying to restore only filters by looking through DataSourceRequest. DataSourceRequest is kind of communication medium between client and server for the operation we do on grid. All the request comes via DataSourceRequest. In previous approach, I was trying to store IFileDescriptor interface which come with class FileDescriptor by looping through filters and serializing into string for saving into database but this IFileDescriptor can also contain CompositeFilterDescriptor which can be nested in nested object which are very tricky to handle. So, I had decompiled entire Kendo.MVC library and found out that all Kendo MVC controls are derived from “JsonObject”. It is there own implementation with ”Serialize” abstract function and “ToJson” function. In controls they are overriding “Serialize” method which depicts t

A wrapper implementation for Kendo Grid usage

A wrapper implementation for any heavily used item is always a good practice. Whatever is not written by us and used at a lot of places should be wrapped within specific functionality to keep it future proof and easily changeable. This also encourages DRY principle to keep our common setting at a central place. Kendo UI items are enormous in configuration, one of an issue I find people keep repeating codes for Kendo Grid configuration. They have built very flexible system to have any configuration, but in most of the cases, we do not need all of those complicated configuration. We would try to see a simpler configuration of same. The actual core implementation is bit complex, but we do not have to bother about it once done since the focus is just on usage only. I recommend doing this practice for as simple as jQuery events, form handling or as simple as any notification system. This just won't make things simple but makes codes much more manageable, easy understand, read or open f