Skip to main content

C# Response files

Response files are similar to batch files, having some specific instruction. On execution they perform some predefined task based on instruction. Response file contains instruction to compile programs.

If we have to build complex program through command line then response files are really helpful in development process. rsp is an extension for response files. By default, csc.rsp file exists under "Framework" folder Ex: C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319. csc.rsp contains long list of system references (dlls).
Some contents under csc.rsp
# Reference the common Framework libraries
/r:Accessibility.dll
/r:Microsoft.CSharp.dll
/r:System.Configuration.dll
/r:System.Configuration.Install.dll
/r:System.Core.dll
/r:System.Data.dll
/r:System.Data.DataSetExtensions.dll
/r:System.Data.Linq.dll
..........

In same way we can have our own response file defined which might include some third party dll. Let's see an example.

Suppose we have to create an application which uses windows form and library named Sample.Test.
Texts under test.rsp file:

# External assembly references. 
/r:System.Windows.Forms.dll
/r:Sample.Test

# File generation instructions
/target:exe /out:Test.exe *.cs  

# symbol is used for comments. We have added two library with /r parameter. *.cs will include all files under that library.

Now for compilation we just need to execute csc @test.rsp






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Handling JSON DateTime format on Asp.Net Core

This is a very simple trick to handle JSON date format on AspNet Core by global settings. This can be applicable for the older version as well. In a newer version by default, .Net depends upon Newtonsoft to process any JSON data. Newtonsoft depends upon Newtonsoft.Json.Converters.IsoDateTimeConverter class for processing date which in turns adds timezone for JSON data format. There is a global setting available for same that can be adjusted according to requirement. So, for example, we want to set default formatting to US format, we just need this code. services.AddMvc() .AddJsonOptions(options => { options.SerializerSettings.DateTimeZoneHandling = "MM/dd/yyyy HH:mm:ss"; });

Elegantly dealing with TimeZones in MVC Core / WebApi

In any new application handling TimeZone/DateTime is mostly least priority and generally, if someone is concerned then it would be handled by using DateTime.UtcNow on codes while creating current dates and converting incoming Date to UTC to save on servers. Basically, the process is followed by saving DateTime to UTC format in a database and keep converting data to native format based on user region or single region in the application's presentation layer. The above is tedious work and have to be followed religiously. If any developer misses out the manual conversion, then that area of code/view would not work. With newer frameworks, there are flexible ways to deal/intercept incoming or outgoing calls to simplify conversion of TimeZones. These are steps/process to achieve it. 1. Central code for storing user's state about TimeZone. Also, central code for conversion logic based on TimeZones. 2. Dependency injection for the above class to ...

Making FluentValidation compatible with Swagger including Enum or fixed List support

FluentValidation is not directly compatible with Swagger API to validate models. But they do provide an interface through which we can compose Swagger validation manually. That means we look under FluentValidation validators and compose Swagger validator properties to make it compatible. More of all mapping by reading information from FluentValidation and setting it to Swagger Model Schema. These can be done on any custom validation from FluentValidation too just that proper schema property has to be available from Swagger. Custom validation from Enum/List values on FluentValidation using FluentValidation.Validators; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using static System.String; /// <summary> /// Validator as per list of items. /// </summary> /// <seealso cref="PropertyValidator" /> public class FixedListValidator : PropertyValidator { /// <summary> /// Gets the valid items /// <...

Enum generation for lookup table through T4

Sometime there is need of mapping some values from database to code level, basically in look up tables. I am going to generate enum based on database values. In this example, I am going for T4 template to generate up enum by using SqlDataReader. We can have any SQL query to generate enum. In my case, Privilege code, name and description from table would generate up enum. <#@ template debug="true" hostSpecific="true" #> <#@ output extension=".cs" #> <#@ Assembly Name="System.Data" #> <#@ include file="EF.Utility.CS.ttinclude"#> <#@ import namespace="System.Data.SqlClient" #> <# var code = new CodeGenerationTools(this); var connectString = "Set connection string"; var queryString = "select PrivilegeCode, PrivilegeName, PrivilegeDescription from Privilege"; #> namespace <#= code.VsNamespaceSuggestion()#> { ...

Using Redis distributed cache in dotnet core with helper extension methods

Redis cache is out process cache provider for a distributed environment. It is popular in Azure Cloud solution, but it also has a standalone application to operate upon in case of small enterprises application. How to install Redis Cache on a local machine? Redis can be used as a local cache server too on our local machines. At first install, Chocolatey https://chocolatey.org/ , to make installation of Redis easy. Also, the version under Chocolatey supports more commands and compatible with Official Cache package from Microsoft. After Chocolatey installation hit choco install redis-64 . Once the installation is done, we can start the server by running redis-server . Distributed Cache package and registration dotnet core provides IDistributedCache interface which can be overrided with our own implementation. That is one of the beauties of dotnet core, having DI implementation at heart of framework. There is already nuget package available to override IDistributedCache i...

Global exception handling and custom logging in AspNet Core with MongoDB

In this, we would be looking into logging and global exception handling in the AspNet Core application with proper registration of logger and global exception handling. Custom logging The first step is to create a data model that we want to save into DB. Error log Data model These are few properties to do logging which could be extended or reduced based on need. public class ErrorLog { /// <summary> /// Gets or sets the Error log identifier. /// </summary> /// <value> /// The Error log identifier. /// </value> [BsonRepresentation(BsonType.ObjectId)] public ObjectId Id { get; set; /// <summary> /// Gets or sets the date. /// </summary> /// <value> /// The date. /// </value> public DateTime Date { get; set; } /// <summary> /// Gets or sets the thread. /// </summary> ...

Centralized model validation both for MVC/WebApi and SPA client-side validation using FluentValidation

Validation is one of the crucial parts of any application. It has to validate on both client side and server side requests. What are target features or implementation from this article? Model validation for any given model. Centralized/One code for validation on both server-side and client-side. Automatic validation of model without writing any extra codes on/under actions for validation.  NO EXTRA/ANY codes on client-side to validate any form. Compatible with SPA. Can be compatible with any client-side validation framework/library. Like Angular Reactive form validation or any jquery validation libraries. Tools used in the implementation? FluentValidation : I feel DataAnnotation validation are excellent and simple to use, but in case of complex validation or writing any custom validations are always tricker and need to write a lot of codes to achieve whereas FluentValidations are simple even in case of complex validation. Generally, we need to validate inc...

Kendo MVC Grid DataSourceRequest with AutoMapper

Kendo Grid does not work directly with AutoMapper but could be managed by simple trick using mapping through ToDataSourceResult. The solution works fine until different filters are applied. The problems occurs because passed filters refer to view model properties where as database model properties are required after AutoMapper is implemented. So, the plan is to intercept DataSourceRequest  and modify names based on database model. To do that we are going to create implementation of  CustomModelBinderAttribute to catch calls and have our own implementation of DataSourceRequestAttribute from Kendo MVC. I will be using same source code from Kendo but will replace column names for different criteria for sort, filters, group etc. Let's first look into how that will be implemented. public ActionResult GetRoles([MyDataSourceRequest(GridId.RolesUserGrid)] DataSourceRequest request) { if (request == null) { throw new Argume...

Using LINQ to Entity efficiently with First/FirstOrDefault/Last/LastOrDefault/Single/SingleOrDefault

We generally use these extension methods First/FirstOrDefault/Last/LastOrDefault/Single/SingleOrDefault with predicates like ctx=> ctx.Model.FirstOrDefault(item => item.Id == 1 ) Or ctx=> ctx.Model.Where(item => item.Id == 1 ).FirstOrDefault() What is the problem with these? FirstOrDefault or similar methods immediately loads all data at once. So, let's say we have fifty columns on table then all those columns data would be retrieved from DB and saved into memory. This link gives a fair idea of different function behavior.  https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb882641.aspx .  So, even if we require only one value from selected field it retrieves all values. What is the solution? The solution is pretty simple. Whenever we need selected items better to do projection before calling FirstOrDefault or similar methods. Ex: Selecting single item ctx.Model.Where(itm => itm.Id == 1) .Select(itm => itm.Name).FirstO...

Efficient custom mapping from data model to ViewModel/Dto or vice versa with LINQ support

How many lines of codes we waste on mapping from one source to a destination like DataModel to ViewModel.  There are well-known Mappers available to do the same but nothing can come close in terms of performance by using manual mapping just that we need to write at too many places or takes a huge chunk of code lines in our main codes, may be under controllers, services or where ever you prefer projection in code. The idea is to develop a proper way to deal with mappings. Some time back I had written code for manual mapping under LINQ queries.  Manual model mapping - LINQ projection technique , this still works great. The idea is to create a cleaner solution as a whole new package for handling Mapping which can support general mappings between models and support of LINQ projection to select the limited number of rows as required. Primary objectives of the implementation. - A Data model to view model/DTO/or any other. - view model/DTO/or any other to a data mode...